Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years
- PMID: 21424818
- PMCID: PMC3162054
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9559-z
Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years
Abstract
Purpose: To explore patient goals and quality of life (QOL) via a prospective registry and compare fertility preservation (FP) outcomes before, during, and after cancer therapy.
Methods: Of 35 patients entering the registry from 3/2008 to 3/2010, 29/35 completed the study survey and agreed to follow-up, and 31/35 completed treatment. Survey results and FP outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Most patients rated the impact of cancer treatment on fertility of highest importance at baseline and 1-year follow-up. QOL scores were overall positive at both intervals. Patients naïve to any cancer treatment (n = 12) had more gametes frozen than patients with prior cancer treatment (n = 19) with no difference in age or gonadotropin dosage. For patients awaiting cancer treatment, the median time from consultation to oocyte retrieval was 25 days. Cancer treatment sequalae posed challenges to optimal FP outcomes.
Conclusions: Fertility preservation remains a significant issue for cancer patients. With early reproductive endocrinologist referral, cancer treatment delay is minimized and FP outcomes are optimized.
Similar articles
-
Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children.Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2022-30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev161. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26141713 Clinical Trial.
-
Priorities in Fertility Decisions for Reproductive-Aged Cancer Patients: Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Sep;6(3):435-443. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0072. Epub 2017 Feb 21. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28221816 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a Nurse Navigator Program on Referral Rates and Use of Fertility Preservation Among Female Cancer Patients: A 14-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(3):e70529. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70529. Cancer Med. 2025. PMID: 39887838 Free PMC article.
-
A Study Protocol for the Australasian Oncofertility Registry: Monitoring Referral Patterns and the Uptake, Quality, and Complications of Fertility Preservation Strategies in Australia and New Zealand.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016 Sep;5(3):215-25. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0062. Epub 2016 Mar 16. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26981848 Review.
-
Fertility preservation options in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer.Cancer. 2018 May 1;124(9):1867-1876. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31255. Epub 2018 Jan 25. Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29370455 Review.
Cited by
-
Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jul;38(7):1767-1775. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02168-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 33797007 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological impact of fertility preservation techniques in women with gynaecological cancer.Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Feb 8;11:ed62. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.ed62. eCollection 2017. Ecancermedicalscience. 2017. PMID: 28275393 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of Referral for Fertility Preservation Among Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Apr;8(2):197-204. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0102. Epub 2019 Jan 24. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30676852 Free PMC article.
-
Oncofertility care for newly diagnosed girls with cancer in a national pediatric oncology setting, the first full year experience from the Princess Máxima Center, the PEARL study.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0246344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246344. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33667234 Free PMC article.
-
Ovarian stimulation is a safe and effective fertility preservation option in the adolescent and young adult population.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Mar;37(3):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01639-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 31828481 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2010. Atlanta; 2010
-
- Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau M, Hood N. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2365–70. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources