Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 23:12:22.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-12-22.

Human CD8 T cells generated in vitro from hematopoietic stem cells are functionally mature

Affiliations

Human CD8 T cells generated in vitro from hematopoietic stem cells are functionally mature

Génève Awong et al. BMC Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: T cell development occurs within the highly specialized thymus. Cytotoxic CD8 T cells are critical in adaptive immunity by targeting virally infected or tumor cells. In this study, we addressed whether functional CD8 T cells can be generated fully in vitro using human umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in coculture with OP9-DL1 cells.

Results: HSC/OP9-DL1 cocultures supported the differentiation of CD8 T cells, which were TCR/CD3(hi) CD27(hi) CD1a(neg) and thus phenotypically resembled mature functional CD8 single positive thymocytes. These in vitro-generated T cells also appeared to be conventional CD8 cells, as they expressed high levels of Eomes and low levels of Plzf, albeit not identical to ex vivo UCB CD8 T cells. Consistent with the phenotypic and molecular characterization, upon TCR-stimulation, in vitro-generated CD8 T cells proliferated, expressed activation markers (MHC-II, CD25, CD38), secreted IFN-γ and expressed Granzyme B, a cytotoxic T-cell effector molecule.

Conclusion: Taken together, the ability to direct human hematopoietic stem cell or T-progenitor cells towards a mature functional phenotype raises the possibility of establishing cell-based treatments for T-immunodeficiencies by rapidly restoring CD8 effector function, thereby mitigating the risks associated with opportunistic infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of CD8+ T cells generated in vitro. Flow cytometric analysis for the expression of CD8 and CD4 from human UCB-derived HSCs cultured on OP9-DL1 cells for 65 days. CD8+ CD4- single positive (SP) cells were gated, as indicated, and analyzed for the expression of CD27 and CD3, with CD1a expression shown for cells gated as CD3+ CD27- or CD27+ (shaded and clear histograms, respectively). Data are representative of over 6 experiments for CD8/CD4 expression and of 3 experiments for CD27/CD1a expression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gene expression analysis of CD8+ SP T cells obtained from HSCs cultured on OP9-DL1 cells. Gene expression analysis by QRT-PCR from coculture-derived CD8 SP T cells (CD8+ CD4- CD3+). CD8 SP, CD4 SP T cells and CD33+ myeloid cells were purified from the Lin+ fraction of UCB samples and served as controls. Transcript levels for the indicated genes were normalized to human β-actin, and these data are representative of 3 independent experiments, with the standard error bars shown corresponding to values obtained from triplicate wells within an individual experiment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characterization of activation marker status on activated CD8+ T cells generated in vitro. (A) Day 60-70 HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture-derived CD8 SP T cells were purified as shown, CD8+ CD4- and CD3+, and stimulated anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs for 5 days. (B) Left-side panel displays flow cytometric analyses of cell size measured by Forward-light Scatter (FSC) intensity; right-side panel displays mean FSC for non-stimulated (NS) and stimulated (Stim) CD8+ CD3+ cells (n = 5; p = 0.004; t-test). (C) Flow cytometric analyses for the expression of CD45RO, CD27, CD38 and MHC-class II for stimulated (Stim) and non-stimulated (NS) CD8+ CD3+ cells (solid black line and shaded histograms, respectively). (D) Flow cytometric analyses for the expression of CD45RO, CD27, CD38 and MHC-class II for stimulated (Stim) and non-stimulated (NS) CD8+ CD3+ cells obtained from the UCB Lin+ fraction. Analysis of CD45RO mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and percentage of CD27+ cells for (E) HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture (in-vitro)-derived CD8+ CD3+ T cells and (F) UCB-ex vivo CD8+ CD3+ T cells were performed (MFI CD45RO in vitro-derived, p = 0.02; n = 3; t-test; %CD27+ in vitro-derived, p = 0.007; n = 3; t-test; %CD27+ UCB-ex vivo, p = 0.03; n = 2; t-test). * indicates statistical significance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Functional characterization on activated CD8+ T cells generated in vitro. (A) Day 60-70 HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture-derived CD8 SP T cells and (B) UCB-ex vivo CD8 T cells were purified and stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 mAbs for 5 days. Flow cytometric analyses of CFSE levels and CD25 (left side), and percentage of CD25+ cells (upper right) and cellularity (lower right) for stimulated (Stim) versus non-stimulated (NS) are shown (* indicates p < 0.05). (C) Analysis of the percentage of in vitro-derived CD8+ CD3+ intracellular Granzyme-B+ expressing cells for stimulated versus non-stimulated is shown (p = 0.02). (E-F) Human IFNγ levels from culture supernatants derived from the above-outlined experiment were determined by ELISA. (E) Statistical significance was measured by unpaired t-test for stimulated and non-stimulated in vitro-derived T cells. * (p < 0.005) 2 μg/mL anti-CD3/CD28 stimulated group versus non-stimulated. ** (p < 0.0005) 10 μg/mL anti-CD3/CD28 versus non-stimulated. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments, with the exception of the data from the 10 μg/ml stimulations, which are derived from 2 independent experiments. (F) Statistical significance was measured by unpaired t-test for stimulated (10 μg/mL) and non-stimulated UCB-ex vivo T cells. * (p < 0.05). Data are representative of at least 4 independent UCB-ex vivo CD8 T cells. The data from the in vitro-generated T cells (non-stimulated and 10 μg/mL stimulation), are derived from 2 independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Characterization of MHC class II-expressing cells derived from OP9-DL1 culture. Flow cytometric analysis for cell surface expression of (A) MHC class II, CD7 (left side) and CD34 on MHC II+ CD7+-gated cells (solid black line) and MHC II+ CD7--gated cells (shaded histogram) from a day 40 HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture, and (B) CD33 and CD7 from a day 45 HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture. Numbers in plots indicate percentage of cells within each gate shown. Data are representative of at least 2 independent experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Characterization of single-positive T cells generated from HSC/OP9-DL1 coculture. Flow cytometric analysis for cell surface expression of CD4 and CD8 is presented for 2 independent cocultures (left side). CD27 expression was examined on CD4+ CD8--gated cells (solid black line) and on CD4- CD8+-gated cells (shaded histogram).

References

    1. Spits H. Development of alphabeta T cells in the human thymus. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:760–772. doi: 10.1038/nri913. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Storek J, Gooley T, Witherspoon RP, Sullivan KM, Storb R. Infectious morbidity in long-term survivors of allogeneic marrow transplantation is associated with low CD4 T cell counts. Am J Hematol. 1997;54:131–138. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199702)54:2<131::AID-AJH6>3.0.CO;2-Y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Douek DC, Vescio RA, Betts MR, Brenchley JM, Hill BJ, Zhang L, Berenson JR, Collins RH, Koup RA. Assessment of thymic output in adults after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and prediction of T-cell reconstitution. Lancet. 2000;355:1875–1881. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02293-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Brink MR, Alpdogan O, Boyd RL. Strategies to enhance T-cell reconstitution in immunocompromised patients. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:856–867. doi: 10.1038/nri1484. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmitt TM, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC. Induction of T cell development from hematopoietic progenitor cells by delta-like-1 in vitro. Immunity. 2002;17:749–756. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00474-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms