Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr 15;20(R1):R28-41.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr110. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Genetic therapy for the nervous system

Affiliations
Review

Genetic therapy for the nervous system

William J Bowers et al. Hum Mol Genet. .

Abstract

Genetic therapy is undergoing a renaissance with expansion of viral and synthetic vectors, use of oligonucleotides (RNA and DNA) and sequence-targeted regulatory molecules, as well as genetically modified cells, including induced pluripotent stem cells from the patients themselves. Several clinical trials for neurologic syndromes appear quite promising. This review covers genetic strategies to ameliorate neurologic syndromes of different etiologies, including lysosomal storage diseases, Alzheimer's disease and other amyloidopathies, Parkinson's disease, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and brain tumors. This field has been propelled by genetic technologies, including identifying disease genes and disruptive mutations, design of genomic interacting elements to regulate transcription and splicing of specific precursor mRNAs and use of novel non-coding regulatory RNAs. These versatile new tools for manipulation of genetic elements provide the ability to tailor the mode of genetic intervention to specific aspects of a disease state.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Therapeutic strategies based on genetic etiology. (A) Recessive disease. In the case of a recessively inherited disease where both alleles (or one on the X chromosome in males) of a gene are mutated, the goal is to replace the defective gene with a functional counterpart or to correct the defect. Typically, a vector is used to deliver a promoter–cDNA expression cassette which either integrates into the genome (1), e.g. lentivirus vector, or resides as an extrachromosomal element (4), e.g. AAV vector. Other approaches include attempts to achieve homologous recombination with the resident allele (4) or, if appropriate, to correct the transcript through transplicing of the precursor mRNA (3). (B) Dominant disease. In the case of dominantly inherited diseases with only one defective neurotoxic gene, a common strategy is to block expression of the mutant message through RNAi (1) which can be delivered either as an shRNA encoded in a vector or as an oligonucleotide. Another approach is to try to neutralize damage caused by the mutant protein through the use of targeted antibodies (2). (C) Multifactorial dysfunction. For many neurodegenerative diseases, there is no one gene that can be targeted to alleviate the condition. Approaches include trying to supplement the neurotransmitter capacity of ‘sick' neurons by providing them with enzymes to generate more of their normal neurotransmitter for release at synapses (1). Alternately, the neurotransmitter profile of interacting neurons can be altered to change their output from excitatory to inhibitory, or vice versa (2). In another common scenario, cells in the vicinity are genetically modified to produce a growth factor which is supportive for the sick neurons (3).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Routes of gene delivery to the CNS. CED of viral vectors into the brain improves considerably their distribution in target structures and hence transduction volumes. This technique can yield volumes of transduced cell distribution 3–3.5-fold larger than the infused volume, which is highly significant for human applications. Viral vectors or secreted transgene products (growth factors, lysosomal enzymes) can be further distributed from the primary target structure by axonal transport (top left diagram). Infusion of recombinant proteins or oligonucleotides into the brain ventricular system, or intrathecal space, leads to widespread CNS distribution via CSF flow. An alternative strategy is to use viral vectors to engineer ependymal cells lining the ventricles or choroid plexus cells to secrete therapeutic proteins into CSF (top right diagram). The BBB with its many constituents has thwarted most gene transfer vehicles from entering the brain from the vasculature. In recent years, PILs and a new generation of viral vectors (AAV and SV40) have been shown to mediate efficient CNS gene transfer after i.v. infusion in newborn and adult animals (bottom right diagram).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Schematic representation of existing cellular therapies, including iPS cells, which require vector-based strategies to generate neuroprecursor cells and neurons to ultimately treat neurodegenerative diseases. A variety of cellular therapies have been devised to repair and replace degenerated neuronal networks within the CNS. These strategies utilize multiple sources of neurons and neuroprecursor cells, including fetal brain, pre-implantation embryos, mesenchymal stem cells and iPS cells. The generation of iPS cells requires the use of viral vectors to deliver multiple genes key for the molecular reprogramming of patient fibroblasts. These iPS cells can be differentiated into neurons or neuroprecursor cells that are subsequently transplanted into the diseased brain.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott N.J., Ronnback L., Hansson E. Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:41–53. doi:10.1038/nrn1824. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armulik A., Genové G., Mäe M., Nisancioglu M.H., Wallgard E., Niaudet C., He L., Norlin J., Lindblom P., Strittmatter K., et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature. 2010;468:557–561. doi:10.1038/nature09522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobo R.H., Laske D.W., Akbasak A., Morrison P.F., Dedrick R.L., Oldfield E.H. Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:2076–2080. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.6.2076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salegio E.A., Kells A.P., Richardson R.M., Hadaczek P., Forsayeth J., Bringas J., Sardi S.P., Passini M.A., Shihabuddin L.S., Cheng S.H., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided delivery of adeno-associated virus type 2 to the primate brain for the treatment of lysosomal storage disorders. Hum. Gene Ther. 2010;21:1093–1103. doi:10.1089/hum.2010.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Passini M.A., Watson D.J., Vite C.H., Landsburg D.J., Peigenbaum A.L., Wolfe J.H. Intraventricular brain injection of adeno-associated virus type 1 (AAV1) in neonatal mice results in complementary patterns of neuronal transduction to AAV2 and total long-term correction of storage lesions in the brains of beta-glucuronidase-deficient mice. J. Virol. 2003;77:7034–7040. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.12.7034-7040.2003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms