Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4496-503.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5641-10.2011.

The importance of being variable

Affiliations

The importance of being variable

Douglas D Garrett et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

New work suggests that blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal variability can be a much more powerful index of human age than mean activation, and that older brains are actually less variable than younger brains. However, little is known of how BOLD variability and task performance may relate. In the current study, we examined BOLD variability in relation to age, and reaction time speed and consistency in healthy younger (20-30 years) and older (56-85 years) adults on three cognitive tasks (perceptual matching, attentional cueing, and delayed match-to-sample). Results indicated that younger, faster, and more consistent performers exhibited significantly higher brain variability across tasks, and showed greater variability-based regional differentiation compared with older, poorer-performing adults. Also, when we compared brain variability- and typical mean-based effects, the respective spatial patterns were essentially orthogonal across brain measures, and any regions that did overlap were largely opposite in directionality of effect. These findings help establish the functional basis of BOLD variability, and further support the statistical and spatial differentiation between BOLD variability and BOLD mean. We thus argue that the precise nature of relations between aging, cognition, and brain function is underappreciated by using mean-based brain measures exclusively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
a, b, Correlations (Pearson r) between age, meanRT, and ISDRT across tasks and SDBOLD (a) and meanBOLD (b). Both model effects resulted from the first latent variable from separate task PLS model runs (one for SDBOLD and one for meanBOLD). Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Although our sample did not consist of middle-aged adults, analyzing age as either a continuous or dichotomous variable (young vs old) made little difference in our PLS model runs. R2 values were within 1.4% across relations involving brain, age, and performance, with no differences in permuted p-values. Thus, we elected to maintain the use of age as a continuous measure, just as we did to evaluate initial bivariate relations (see Notes).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PLS brain patterns and overlay plots. a, Blue regions indicate greater and yellow/red regions indicate lesser brain variability with younger age, and faster and more consistent RT performance. b, Blue regions indicate greater and yellow/red regions indicate lesser mean brain activity with younger age, and faster and more consistent RT performance. In both a and b, all robust areas surpassed a thresholded bootstrap ratio (salience/SE) of ≥ 3.00 (for yellow/red regions) or ≤−3.00 (for blue regions). Darker colors indicate greater robustness. c, Overlay plot highlighting differences between SDBOLD and meanBOLD spatial patterns. Red, Greater SDBOLD with younger age and better performance, but no meanBOLD effect; yellow, lesser SDBOLD with younger age and better performance, but no meanBOLD effect; cyan, greater meanBOLD with younger age and better performance, but no SDBOLD effect; blue, lesser meanBOLD with younger age and better performance, but no SDBOLD effect. d, Overlay plot highlighting overlap between SDBOLD and meanBOLD spatial patterns. Red, Greater SDBOLD and lesser meanBOLD with younger age and better performance. All images represent every other slice in z-direction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Levels of brain variability in robust blue and yellow regions from our SDBOLD PLS analysis. Blue and yellow regions refer to those in Figure 2a (we label yellow/red in Fig. 2a as yellow here). Fast and slow refer to ≤1 and ≥1 SD from the sample meanRT across tasks; consistent and inconsistent refer to ≤ 1 and ≥1 SD from the sample average ISDRT across tasks. Blue areas represent 84% and yellow areas represent 16% of robust brain voxels identified in the PLS SDBOLD analysis. Thus, the group difference noted here for blue regions is much more prominent in brain than is the difference noted for yellow regions. Unsurprisingly, a separate analysis of overall brain variability (i.e., SDBOLD of all robust voxels, regardless of whether blue or yellow) also revealed a strong group difference, F(1,31) = 21.77, p < 0.0001, partial η2 = 0.41; younger, faster, more consistent adults exhibited 25% more brain variability than older, slower, more inconsistent adults across tasks.

References

    1. Andrews-Hanna JR, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Lustig C, Head D, Raichle ME, Buckner RL. Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron. 2007;56:924–935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging. 1997;12:12–21. - PubMed
    1. Beck JM, Ma WJ, Kiani R, Hanks T, Churchland AK, Roitman J, Shadlen MN, Latham PE, Pouget A. Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making. Neuron. 2008;60:1142–1152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckmann CF, Smith SM. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:137–152. - PubMed
    1. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:537–541. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms