Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality
- PMID: 21430721
- PMCID: PMC3836173
- DOI: 10.1038/nature09831
Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality
Abstract
Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson 466, 1057-1062 (2010); Nowak et al. reply. Nowak et al. argue that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explaining the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality. However, we believe that their arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature. We will focus our comments on three general issues.
Comment in
-
Public opinion: Science petitions are a facade of numbers.Nature. 2013 Jan 24;493(7433):480. doi: 10.1038/493480a. Nature. 2013. PMID: 23344349 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
The evolution of eusociality.Nature. 2010 Aug 26;466(7310):1057-62. doi: 10.1038/nature09205. Nature. 2010. PMID: 20740005 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 1964;7:1–52. - PubMed
-
- Hamilton WD. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature. 1970;228:1218–1220. - PubMed
-
- Grafen A. Optimisation of inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 2006;238:541–563. - PubMed
-
- Frank SA. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton Univ. Press; 1998.
