Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 14:16.
doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890.

An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory

Thierry Pelaccia  1 , Jacques Tardif, Emmanuel Triby, Bernard Charlin
Affiliations

An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory

Thierry Pelaccia et al. Med Educ Online. .

Abstract

Context: Clinical reasoning plays a major role in the ability of doctors to make diagnoses and decisions. It is considered as the physician's most critical competence, and has been widely studied by physicians, educationalists, psychologists and sociologists. Since the 1970s, many theories about clinical reasoning in medicine have been put forward.

Purpose: This paper aims at exploring a comprehensive approach: the "dual-process theory", a model developed by cognitive psychologists over the last few years.

Discussion: After 40 years of sometimes contradictory studies on clinical reasoning, the dual-process theory gives us many answers on how doctors think while making diagnoses and decisions. It highlights the importance of physicians' intuition and the high level of interaction between analytical and non-analytical processes. However, it has not received much attention in the medical education literature. The implications of dual-process models of reasoning in terms of medical education will be discussed.

Keywords: Dual process; analytical reasoning; diagnostic errors; expertise; hypothetico-deduction; pattern recognition; professional intuition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-based learning. An approach to medical education. New York: Springer; 1980.
    1. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med. 2000;75:182–90. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz A, Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2008. pp. 223–34.
    1. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med. 1990;65:611–21. - PubMed
    1. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49:709–24. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources