Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;16(3):178-84.
doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0175-9. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey

Wakaha Ikeda  1 , Yutaka Inaba, Tatsuya Takeshita, Katsumi Yoshida, Kumiko Ogoshi, Kazushi Okamoto
Affiliations

Does the Japanese Society for Hygiene need its own Code of Conduct? A comparison of the responses of councilors and junior members based on a questionnaire survey

Wakaha Ikeda et al. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare current awareness of the "On a Code of Conduct for Scientists" (OCCS) among members of the Japanese Society for Hygiene (JSH).

Method: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was mailed to JSH members, including 439 councilors and 376 junior members (who were under 50 years of age with a membership of 3 years or longer, excluding councilors). Councilors were surveyed from November to December 2007, while junior members were surveyed from November to December 2008.

Results: The overall response rate was 40.6% (n = 331/815), with responses from 46.7% of the councilors (n = 205/439) and 33.5% of the junior members (n = 126/376). Among the respondents, 36.0% of councilors (n = 68) and 59.8% of junior members (n = 73) did not know the contents of "On the Code of Conduct for Scientists" (P < 0.01), while 76.3% of councilors (n = 145) and 61.4% of junior members (n = 75) had not heard of it (P < 0.05). However, a majority of the respondents reported interest in the Code [70.0% of councilors (n = 133), 68.6% of junior members (n = 83)] (P < 0.05) and a favorable attitude towards research ethics education [69.3% of councilors (n = 133), 68.9% of junior members (n = 84)] (P < 0.54). In addition, 24.3% of the responding councilors (n = 46) and 15.7% of the responding junior members (n = 19) believe it necessary for JSH to formulate its own code of conduct for scientists (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: We clarified the current state of awareness of the OCCS among JSH members as well as the opinion of members for the JSH to have its own Code of Conduct for Scientists. This result provides important information that should be considered during the formulation of an individual code of conduct for scientists in the JSH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Robert FS. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist’s papers retracted. Science. 2003;299:31. - PubMed
    1. Check E, Cyranoski D. Korean scandal will have global fallout. Nature. 2005;438:1056–1057. doi: 10.1038/4381056a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saunders R, Savulescu J. Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud? J Med Ethics. 2008;34:214–221. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Statement for 14th Annual Meeting of the Science Council of Japan “Code of Conduct for Scientists” Science Council of Japan; 2006. http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/iinkai/kodo/index.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2008.
    1. Ikeda W, Inaba Y, Yoshida K, Takeshita T, Ogoshi K, Okamoto K. Attitudes towards the Code of Conduct for Scientists among Council Members of the Japanese Society for Hygiene. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2010;65(1):60–74. doi: 10.1265/jjh.65.60. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types