Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients
- PMID: 21432098
- PMCID: PMC2723386
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02897914
Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients
Abstract
Our goals are to review the literature on the definition and epidemiology of fecal incontinence (FI), the risk factors involved, available treatment options, and measurement of the quality of life (QOL) of patients with this condition. Articles included for review were searched following the guidelines set by Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. FI was defined variously depending upon the duration, type, and amount of leakage. About 17 published papers were reviewed on the prevalence of FI that ranged from 1.4% to 50%. Potential risk factors included perianal injury/surgery, and fair/poor general health. QOL assessment using various grading scales provided an objective method of evaluating patients before and after treatment. Management included medical, physiotherapy, and surgical options. Through the range of various references, a clear definition of FI should be specified, which reflects its epidemiology in the various studies. These differences in definition would significantly affect its prevalence. Many risk factors have been sited but further epidemiological studies are necessary to elucidate FI. Understanding the etiology of the disease is an important initial step to provide adequate treatment of FI. QOL assessment provides objective and subjective method in the analysis of effectiveness of therapy.
Keywords: anal incontinence; epidemiology; fecal incontinence; quality of life; risk factors.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in adults.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Dec;(161):1-379. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 18457475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 1-Definition, Epidemiology, Etiology, Pathophysiology and Causes, Risk Factors, Clinical Evaluations, and Symptomatic Scores and QoL Questionnaire for Clinical Evaluations-English Version.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021 Jan 28;5(1):52-66. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2020-057. eCollection 2021. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2021. PMID: 33537501 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does Bariatric Surgery Improve Faecal Incontinence? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):2942-2953. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05360-7. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 33852150 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal incontinence among morbid obese women seeking for weight loss surgery: an underappreciated association with adverse impact on quality of life.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;23(5):493-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0432-6. Epub 2008 Jan 29. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 18228028
-
Sacral nerve stimulation for urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(3):1-64. Epub 2005 Mar 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005. PMID: 23074472 Free PMC article.
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.274.7.559', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.274.7.559'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '7629985', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7629985/'}]}
- Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995; 274(7): 559–561. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/BF02050307', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02050307'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8416784', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8416784/'}]}
- Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77–97. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1545835', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1545835/'}]}
- Madoff RD, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal incontinence. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992; 326: 1002–1007. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/BF02555356', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02555356'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '3491746', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3491746/'}]}
- Nivatongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy. An experience with 1555 polypectomies. Dis. Colon rectum 1986; 29: 825. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05987.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05987.x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12358252', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12358252/'}]}
- Giamundo P, Welber A, Weiss E, Vernava III A, Nogueras J, Wexner S. The Procon incontinence device: a new nonsurgical approach to preventing episodes of fecal incontinence. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(9): 2328–2332. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources