Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;25(3):400-12.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.544160.

Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework

Affiliations
Review

Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework

Anett Gyurak et al. Cogn Emot. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that emotions can be regulated in an astonishing variety of ways. Most research to date has focused on explicit (effortful) forms of emotion regulation. However, there is growing research interest in implicit (automatic) forms of emotion regulation. To organise emerging findings, we present a dual-process framework that integrates explicit and implicit forms of emotion regulation, and argue that both forms of regulation are necessary for well-being. In the first section of this review, we provide a broad overview of the construct of emotion regulation, with an emphasis on explicit and implicit processes. In the second section, we focus on explicit emotion regulation, considering both neural mechanisms that are associated with these processes and their experiential and physiological consequences. In the third section, we turn to several forms of implicit emotion regulation, and integrate the burgeoning literature in this area. We conclude by outlining open questions and areas for future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A dual-process model of emotion regulation. Explicit emotion regulation processes are depicted in the center. Everything outside this circle represents processes that are related to implicit emotion regulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic depiction of an explicit emotion regulation task modeled after McRae et al. (2010). Explicit emotion regulation performance is indexed by contrasting emotional responding in the reactivity and regulation trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic depiction of the implicit emotion regulation task modeled after Etkin et al., (2006). ITI = Inter Trial Interval. RT = response time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banks SJ, Eddy KT, Angstadt M, Nathan PJ, Phan KL. Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2007;2(4):303–312. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bargh JA. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer Robert S, Jr, Srull Thomas K., editors. Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 1: Basic processes. 1994.
    1. Bargh JA, Williams LE. The Nonconscious regulation of emotion. In: Gross James J., editor. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 2007. pp. 429–445.pp. xvii
    1. Beauregard M, Lévesque J, Bourgouin P. Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion. The journal of neuroscience. 2001;21(18):RC165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borkovec TD, Alcaine OM, Behar E. Avoidance theory of worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. In: Heimberg Richard G, Turk Cynthia L, Mennin Douglas S., editors. Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice. Vol. 2004. 2004.

LinkOut - more resources