Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data
- PMID: 21434760
- PMCID: PMC3235280
- DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566134
Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data
Abstract
Background and purpose: The reproducibility of results and potential confounders in sample-based studies is important to consider in the assessment of studies. Comprehensive arthroplasty registers could serve as a reference dataset for comparative analyses. We analyzed an implant that is frequently used worldwide, the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement, in order to identify potential confounders inherent in the datasets and to evaluate the outcome achieved with this implant.
Methods: We performed a structured literature review of the data published on the revision rate of the Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Both clinical follow-up studies and worldwide registry data were included. Confidence intervals were calculated to determine the statistical significance of differences.
Results: A substantial proportion of the published data (52-68% depending on the method of calculation) is derived from studies involving participation of the institution that developed the implant. The results published by this group show a statistically significant deviation from the reference datasets from registers or independent studies. Data from the developing hospital show mean revision rates that are 4 times lower than those based on worldwide register data, and 3 times lower than the ones quoted in independent studies. On average, the data published in independent studies are reproducible in registry data.
Interpretation: A conventional meta-analysis of clinical studies is substantially affected by the influence of the developing hospital, and is therefore subject to bias. For assessment of the outcome of implants, registry data are superior and, in terms of reference data for the detection of potential bias factors in the literature, could make an essential contribution to meta-analyses.
Comment in
-
Outcome of the cementless Taperloc stem.Acta Orthop. 2011 Oct;82(5):633-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.627494. Acta Orthop. 2011. PMID: 22103281 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Jr, Adams JB. Obesity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States. Orthopaedics (5 Suppl) 2007;30:19–23. - PubMed
-
- Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O'Connor J, Goodfellow J. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop. 1993;((295)):205–13. - PubMed
-
- Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2006. http://www.dhr.dk/annual_report.htm. accessed 2009-08-26.
-
- Emerson RH, Jr, Higgins LL. A comparison of highly instrumented and minimally instrumented unicompartmental knee prostheses. Clin Orthop. 2004;((428)):153–7. - PubMed
-
- Emerson RH, Jr, Higgins LL. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008;90:118–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical