Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter: 311 consecutive patients followed for 1 year
- PMID: 21434790
- PMCID: PMC3235286
- DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566143
Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter: 311 consecutive patients followed for 1 year
Abstract
Background and purpose: In recent years, intramedullary nails (INs) for the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures have gained prominence relative to conventional, sliding hip screws (SHSs). There is little empirical background for this development, however. A previous series of ours suggested that the use of SHS was not adequate in situations with fragile or fractured lateral femoral walls, where it often led to lack of healing in a maximally telescoped position. We hypothesized that INs would be the superior implant in these specific circumstances.
Methods: We retrospectively examined 311 consecutive patients treated in our department between 2002 and 2008, with either an IN (n = 158) or an SHS (n = 153) mounted on a 4-hole side-plate, for an AO/OTA type 31A1-2 pertrochanteric fracture with a detached greater trochanter. The status of the lesser trochanter was assessed preoperatively and the integrity of the lateral femoral wall, fracture reduction, and position of the implants were assessed postoperatively. Reoperations due to technical failure were recorded for one year postoperatively.
Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the groups were similar regarding demographic and biomechanical parameters. The lateral femoral wall was more frequently fractured during SHS implantation (42 patients) than in the IN group (9 patients) (p < 0.001). 6 (4%) of the 158 patients operated with IN had to be reoperated, as compared to 22 (14%) in the SHS group of 153 patients (p = 0.001).
Interpretation: IN had a lower reoperation rate than SHS in these pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter. IN left more lateral femoral walls intact.
Figures


References
-
- American Society of Anesthesiologists New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111.
-
- Anglen JO, Weinstein JN. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: Changing pattern of practice. A review of the American board of orthopaedic surgery database. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008;90:700–7. - PubMed
-
- Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995;77:1058–64. - PubMed
-
- Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA G, Roukema GR. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: The AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury. 2010;41:377–81. - PubMed
-
- Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kristensen BB, Jensen PS, Kehlet H. Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on rehabilitation and pain after hip fracture surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1197–204. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical