Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun;12(3):361-8.
doi: 10.1007/s10194-011-0325-5. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine

Marco Bartolini et al. J Headache Pain. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with acute treatment of migraine with frovatriptan or almotriptan by preference questionnaire. One hundred and thirty three subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS 2004 criteria), with at least one migraine attack in the preceding 6 months, were enrolled and randomized to frovatriptan 2.5 mg or almotriptan 12.5 mg, treating 1-3 attacks. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double blind, cross-over design, with treatment periods lasting <3 months. At study end patients assigned preference to one of the treatments using a questionnaire with a score from 0 to 5 (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints were pain free and pain relief episodes at 2 and 4 h, and recurrent and sustained pain free episodes within 48 h. Of the 133 patients (86%, intention-to-treat population) 114 of them expressed a preference for a triptan. The average preference score was not significantly different between frovatriptan (3.1 ± 1.3) and almotriptan (3.4 ± 1.3). The rates of pain free (30% frovatriptan vs. 32% almotriptan) and pain relief (54% vs. 56%) episodes at 2 h did not significantly differ between treatments. This was the case also at 4 h (pain free: 56% vs. 59%; pain relief: 75% vs. 72%). Recurrent episodes were significantly (P < 0.05) less frequent under frovatriptan (30% vs. 44%), also for the attacks treated within 30 min. No significant differences were observed in sustained pain free episodes (21% vs. 18%). The tolerability profile was similar between the two drugs. In conclusion, our study suggests that frovatriptan has a similar efficacy of almotriptan in the short-term, while some advantages are observed during long-term treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participants throughout the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative hazard of recurrence over the 48 h during treatment with frovatriptan or almotriptan, in the 114 patients of the whole study population and for attacks for which the drug was taken within 30 min from the onset of the episode

References

    1. Ferrari MD. Migraine. Lancet. 1998;351:1043–1051. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11370-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartleson JD, Cutrer FM. Migraine update. Diagnosis and treatment. Minn Med. 2010;93:36–41. - PubMed
    1. Johnston MM, Rapoport AM. Triptans for the management of migraine. Drugs. 2010;70:1505–1518. doi: 10.2165/11537990-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cady R, Schreiber C. Sumatriptan: update and review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006;7:1503–1514. doi: 10.1517/14656566.7.11.1503. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loder E. Triptan therapy in migraine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:63–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0910887. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources