Response to: DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations- authors' reply

Affiliations

¹ Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas 76107, USA. Ranajit.chakraborty@unthsc.edu.

Ranajit Chakraborty et al. Investig Genet. 2011.

. 2011 Mar 25;2(1):8.

doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-2-8.

¹ Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas 76107, USA. Ranajit.chakraborty@unthsc.edu.

No abstract available

References

1. Egeland T, Dawid AP, Mortera J, Mostad P, Tillmar A. Comment on 'DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations' by Ge et al (2010) Investigative Genetics. 2010;2:7. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-2-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Ge J, Budowle B, Chakraborty R. DNA identification by pedigree likelihood ratio accommodating population substructure and mutations. Investigative Genetics. 2010;1:8. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL. Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;124:55–61. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00564-3. - DOI - PubMed
1. Estoup A, Jarne P, Cornuet JM. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetic analysis. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1591–1604. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01576.x. - DOI - PubMed
1. Di Rienzo A, Peterson AC, Garza JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin M, Freimrt NB. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed