Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation
- PMID: 21443610
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation
Abstract
Objectives: To test the fracture load of zirconia abutments with different types of implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation and to compare their bending moments to internally connected identical titanium abutments.
Materials and methods: Forty-eight identical customized zirconia abutments with different implant-abutment connections were fabricated for four different test groups: one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (BL; Straumann Bonelevel), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (RS; Nobel Biocare Replace Select), external implant-abutment connection (B; Brånemark MK III), two-piece internal implant-abutment connection (SP; Straumann Standard Plus). Twelve titanium abutments with one-piece internal implant-abutment connection (T; Straumann Bonelevel) served as control group. After aging by means of thermocycling (5-50°C, 120 s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load, 1.67 Hz), static load was applied at a 30° angle to the palatal surface until failure. Bending moments were calculated for comparison of the groups. Data were analyzed descriptively and by performing the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.
Results: The mean bending moments of the abutments were 714.1 ± 184.9 N cm (T), 331.7 ± 57.8 N cm (BL), 429.7 ± 62.8 N cm (RS), 285.8 ± 64.4 N cm (B) and 379.9 ± 59.1 N cm (SP). The bending moments of control group T were significantly higher than those of all other groups. The values of group RS were significantly higher than those of group B but within the value range of groups SP and BL.
Conclusion: The bending moments of the different tested types of zirconia abutments vary with different implant-abutment connections after chewing simulation. The use of a secondary metallic component might have a beneficial influence on the stability of zirconia abutments.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Similar articles
-
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014. PMID: 23735182
-
Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):505-12. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 22616042
-
Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. doi: 10.1111/clr.13139. Epub 2018 Mar 11. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 29527740
-
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016. PMID: 27239815
-
Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Mar 12. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 35292155
Cited by
-
Influence of Pre-Treatment and Artificial Aging on the Retention of 3D-Printed Permanent Composite Crowns.Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 4;10(9):2186. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092186. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36140287 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):388-395. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388. Epub 2016 Oct 21. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016. PMID: 27826389 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Liner-Bonding of Implant-Supported Glass-Ceramic Crown to Zirconia Abutment on Bond Strength and Fracture Resistance.Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 30;12(17):2798. doi: 10.3390/ma12172798. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31480271 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture resistance of different implant supported ceramic abutment/crown systems.Eur Oral Res. 2019 May;53(2):80-87. doi: 10.26650/eor.20199657. Epub 2019 May 1. Eur Oral Res. 2019. PMID: 31309198 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement of Fracture Strength of Zirconia Dental Implant Abutments with Internal and External Connections Using Acoustic Emission.Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 23;12(12):2009. doi: 10.3390/ma12122009. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31234580 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources