Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates obtained through population-based surveillance in South Africa in 2002-2003 and 2007-2008
- PMID: 21444707
- PMCID: PMC3101403
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00048-11
Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates obtained through population-based surveillance in South Africa in 2002-2003 and 2007-2008
Abstract
Cryptococcus neoformans is the most common cause of meningitis among adult South Africans with HIV infection/AIDS. Widespread use of fluconazole for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis and other HIV-associated opportunistic fungal infections in South Africa may lead to the emergence of isolates with reduced fluconazole susceptibility. MIC testing using a reference broth microdilution method was used to determine if isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole or amphotericin B had emerged among cases of incident disease. Incident isolates were tested from two surveillance periods (2002-2003 and 2007-2008) when population-based surveillance was conducted in Gauteng Province, South Africa. These isolates were also tested for susceptibility to flucytosine, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Serially collected isolate pairs from cases at several large South African hospitals were also tested for susceptibility to fluconazole. Of the 487 incident isolates tested, only 3 (0.6%) demonstrated a fluconazole MIC of ≥ 16 μg/ml; all of these isolates were from 2002-2003. All incident isolates were inhibited by very low concentrations of amphotericin B and exhibited very low MICs to voriconazole and posaconazole. Of 67 cases with serially collected isolate pairs, only 1 case was detected where the isolate collected more than 30 days later had a fluconazole MIC value significantly higher than the MIC of the corresponding incident isolate. Although routine antifungal susceptibility testing of incident isolates is not currently recommended in clinical settings, it is still clearly important for public health to periodically monitor for the emergence of resistance.
References
-
- Aller A. I., et al. 2005. Antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in HIV-infected patients to fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole in Spain: 1994-1996 and 1997-2005. Chemotherapy 53:300–305 - PubMed
-
- Apisarnthanarak A., Mundy L. M. 2008. The impact of primary prophylaxis for cryptococcosis on fluconazole resistance in Candida species. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 47:644–645 - PubMed
-
- Berg J., Clancy C. J., Nguyen M. H. 1998. The hidden danger of primary fluconazole prophylaxis for patients with AIDS. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:186–187 - PubMed
-
- Bicanic T., et al. 2009. Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid pressure, fungal burden and outcome in patients with cryptococcal meningitis undergoing serial lumbar punctures. AIDS 23:701–706 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources