Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun;37(6):933-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam

Malcie Mesnil et al. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and adverse events related to inhaled sevoflurane for long-term sedation compared with standard intravenous (i.v.) sedation with propofol or midazolam.

Methods: Randomized controlled trial. Sixty intensive care unit (ICU) patients expected to require more than 24 h sedation were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group S, inhaled sevoflurane; group P, i.v. propofol; group M, i.v. midazolam. All patients also received i.v. remifentanil for goal-directed sedation (Ramsay scale and pain score) until extubation or for a maximum of 96 h. Primary end points were wake-up times and extubation delay from termination of sedative administration. Proportion of time within Ramsay score 3-4, i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h post extubation, hallucination episodes after end of sedation, adverse events, inorganic fluoride plasma levels, and ambient sevoflurane concentrations were recorded.

Results: Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Wake-up time and extubation delay were significantly (P<0.01) shorter in group S (18.6 ± 11.8 and 33.6 ± 13.1 min) than in group P (91.3 ± 35.2 and 326.11 ± 360.2 min) or M (260.2 ± 150.2 and 599.6 ± 586.6 min). Proportion of time within desired interval of sedation score was comparable between groups. Morphine consumption during the 24 h following extubation was lower in group S than in groups P and M. Four hallucination episodes were reported in group P, five in group M, and none in group S (P=0.04). No hepatic or renal adverse events were reported. Mean plasma fluoride value was 82 μmol l(-1) (range 12-220 μmol l(-1)), and mean ambient sevoflurane concentration was 0.3 ± 0.1 ppm.

Conclusions: Long-term inhaled sevoflurane sedation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to i.v. propofol or midazolam. It decreases wake-up and extubation times, and post extubation morphine consumption, and increases awakening quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Volatile agents for ICU sedation?
    Bracco D, Donatelli F. Bracco D, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun;37(6):895-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2214-4. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Intensive Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21445640 No abstract available.

References

    1. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jul;99(1):9-17 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1993 Feb;103(2):557-64 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62(12):1266-80 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1182-91 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1989 May 13;298(6683):1277-80 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms