Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study
- PMID: 21447572
- PMCID: PMC3230109
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d1773
Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study
Abstract
Objective: To explore how transitions to a palliative care approach are perceived to be managed in acute hospital settings in England.
Design: Qualitative study.
Setting: Secondary or primary care settings in two contrasting areas of England.
Participants: 58 health professionals involved in the provision of palliative care in secondary or primary care.
Results: Participants identified that a structured transition to a palliative care approach of the type advocated in UK policy guidance is seldom evident in acute hospital settings. In particular they reported that prognosis is not routinely discussed with inpatients. Achieving consensus among the clinical team about transition to palliative care was seen as fundamental to the transition being effected; however, this was thought to be insufficiently achieved in practice. Secondary care professionals reported that discussions about adopting a palliative care approach to patient management were not often held with patients; primary care professionals confirmed that patients were often discharged from hospital with "false hope" of cure because this information had not been conveyed. Key barriers to ensuring a smooth transition to palliative care included the difficulty of "standing back" in an acute hospital situation, professional hierarchies that limited the ability of junior medical and nursing staff to input into decisions on care, and poor communication.
Conclusion: Significant barriers to implementing a policy of structured transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals were identified by health professionals in both primary and secondary care. These need to be addressed if current UK policy on management of palliative care in acute hospitals is to be established.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Republished in
-
Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Jun;1(1):42-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1773. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011. PMID: 24653048
Comment in
-
Palliative care is not same as end of life care.BMJ. 2011 May 10;342:d2735. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2735. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21558339 No abstract available.
-
Palliative care. Uncertainty in dying: keeping both hands open.BMJ. 2011 May 10;342:d2887. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2887. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21558341 No abstract available.
References
-
- General Medical Council. Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision-making. 2010. www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/6858.asp.
-
- Bell D. GMC guidance on end of life care. BMJ 2010;340:c3231. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health. The end of life care strategy for England. DoH, 2008.
-
- Boyd K, Murray SA. Recognising and managing key transitions in end of life care. BMJ 2010;341:c4863. - PubMed
-
- Schofield P, Carey M, Love A, Nehill C, Wein S. Would you like to talk about your future treatment options? Discussing the transition from curative cancer treatment to palliative care. Palliat Med 2006;20:397-406. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical