Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 12;104(8):1246-8.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.92. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients

P L Friedland  1 , B Bozic, J Dewar, R Kuan, C Meyer, M Phillips
Affiliations

Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients

P L Friedland et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: We analysed the outcomes of 726 cases of primary head and neck cancer patients managed between 1996 and 2008, including those managed in the multidisciplinary clinic or team setting (MDT) and those managed outside of an MDT by individual disciplines (non-MDT) in the same institution.

Methods: Data were collected from the Hospital Based Cancer Registry and a database within the Head and Neck Cancer Clinic. Univariable comparisons and multivariable analyses were performed using a logistic regression model. Survival by staging was analysed. Comparisons of management and outcomes were made between MDT and non-MDT patients.

Results: 395 patients (54%) had been managed in the MDT vs 331 patients (46%) non-MDT. MDT patients were more likely to have advanced disease (likelihood ratio χ(2)=44.7, P<0.001). Stage IV MDT patients had significantly improved 5-year survival compared with non-MDT patients (hazard ratio=0.69, 95% CI=0.51-0.88, P=0.004) and more synchronous chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.004), and the non-MDT group had more radiotherapy as a single modality (P=0.002).

Conclusions: The improved survival of MDT-managed stage IV patients probably represents both the selection of multimodality treatment and chemotherapeutic advances that these patients received in a multidisciplinary team setting by head and neck cancer specialists as opposed to cancer generalists in a non-MDT setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Head and neck cancer patients seen at MDT and non-MDT, 1996–2008.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for H&N cancer patients for all stages and Kaplan–Meier survival curves for H&N cancer patients: stage-IV cases only.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Birchall M, Bailey D, King P (2004) Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. Br J Cancer 91: 1477–1481 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J (1985) A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 4: 87–90 - PubMed
    1. Expert Advisory Group on Cancer (1995) A Report by the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services – the Calman-Hine Report. Department of Health: London
    1. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand Stat Theory Appl 6: 65–70
    1. Junor EJ, Hole DJ, Gillis CR (1994) Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. Br J Cancer 70: 363–370 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms