Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 3;8(3):198-202.
doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.198.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates from various clinical specimens

Affiliations

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Brucella isolates from various clinical specimens

Yasemin Bayram et al. Int J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonotic disease and still constitutes a major public health problem. In the study we claimed to identify Brucella species from clinical samples of patients with active brucellosis from Van region of Eastern Anatolia and to determine in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of these strains to commonly used anti-Brucella agents and a possible new alternative tigecycline.

Materials and methods: A total of 56 Brucella isolates were enrolled the study and the identification of the isolates were based on conventional methods. In vitro activities of antimicrobials were evaluated by the E test method.

Results: All isolates were identified as B. melitensis. MIC(90) values of doxycycline, streptomycin, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tigecycline were 0.064 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 2 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L and 0.094 mg/L, respectively. Tigecycline had low MIC(50) and MIC(90) values against all B. melitensis strains; the highest MIC observed was 0.25 μg/mL.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that tigecycline can be a therapeutic alternative option for the treatment of brucellosis.

Keywords: Brucella; E-test; antimicrobial susceptibility; tigecycline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:91–99. - PubMed
    1. Young EJ. Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2669–2672.
    1. Black TF. Brucellosis. In: Cohen J, Powderly WG, editors. Infectious diseases; 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. pp. 1665–1667.
    1. Doğanay M, Meşe-Alp E. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doganay M, eds. Infeksiyon hastalıkları ve mikrobiyolojisi; 3rd ed. Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2008. pp. 897–909.
    1. Yüce A, Alp-Çavuş S. Türkiye'de bruselloz: genel bakış. Klimik derg. 2006;19:87–97.

MeSH terms