Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures
- PMID: 21449688
- DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.572287
Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of two distinct collar geometries of implants on stress distribution in the bone around the implants supporting cantilever fixed partial dentures (CFPDs) as well as in the implant-abutment complex and superstructures.
Materials and methods: The three-dimensional finite element method was selected to evaluate the stress distribution. CFPDs which was supported by microthread collar structured (MCS) and non-microthread collar structured (NMCS) implants was modeled; 300 N vertical, 150 N oblique and 60 N horizontal forces were applied to the models separately. The stress values in the bone, implant-abutment complex and superstructures were calculated.
Results: In the MCS model, higher stresses were located in the cortical bone and implant-abutment complex in the case of vertical load while decreased stresses in cortical bone and implant-abutment complex were noted within horizontal and oblique loading. In the case of vertical load, decreased stresses have been noted in cancellous bone and framework. Upon horizontal and oblique loading, a MCS model had higher stress in cancellous bone and framework than the NMCS model. Higher von Mises stresses have been noted in veneering material for NMCS models.
Conclusion: It has been concluded that stress distribution in implant-supported CFPDs correlated with the macro design of the implant collar and the direction of applied force.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Jan;70(1):61-71. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.597775. Epub 2011 Jul 6. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012. PMID: 21732740
-
The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):129-34. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100413. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22945697
-
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019. J Prosthet Dent. 2005. PMID: 15775923
-
Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):421-38. Technol Health Care. 2006. PMID: 17065763 Review.
-
Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses.J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul;21(5):413-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00835.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13. J Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22413997 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the stresses produced on the bone implant/tissue interface to the different insertion angulations of the implant - a three-dimensional analysis by the finite elements method.J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Oct 1;12(10):e930-e937. doi: 10.4317/jced.57387. eCollection 2020 Oct. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020. PMID: 33154794 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Aluminum and Copper on Mechanical Properties of Biocompatible Ti-Mo Alloys: A Simulation-Based Investigation.Micromachines (Basel). 2023 May 20;14(5):1081. doi: 10.3390/mi14051081. Micromachines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37241705 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources