Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i18-23.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955.

Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success

Affiliations

Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success

John Øvretveit. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Context can be defined as all factors that are not part of a quality improvement intervention itself. More research indicates which aspects are 'conditions for improvement', which influence improvement success. However, little is known about which conditions are most important, whether these are different for different quality interventions or whether some become less or more important at different times in carrying out an improvement. Knowing more about these conditions could help speed up and spread improvements and develop the science. This paper proposes ways to build knowledge about the conditions needed for different changes, and to create conditional-attribution explanations to provide qualified generalisations. It describes theory-based, non-experimental research designs. It also suggests that 'practical improvers' can make their changes more effective by reflecting on and revising their own 'assumption-theories' about the conditions which will help and hinder the improvements they aim to implement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725–32 - PubMed
    1. Schouten LMT, Hulscher M, Van Everdingen J, et al. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ 2008;336:1491–4 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Øvretveit J. A framework for quality improvement translation: understanding the conditionality of interventions. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf (Global supplement) 2004:15–24
    1. Glasgow RE. Evaluation of theory-based interventions: the RE-AIM model. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education. 3rd edn San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002:531–44
    1. Solberg L, Brekke M, Fasio J, et al. Lessons from experienced guideline implementers: attend to many factors and use multiple strategies. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000;26:171–88 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms