Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 May;91(5):722-32.
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100109. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain

Julie M Fritz et al. Phys Ther. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) was recently developed for primary care providers to use as a screening tool for subgrouping people with low back pain (LBP) on the basis of modifiable prognostic factors. The use of the SBT in physical therapy has not been described.

Objective: The aims of this study were to describe the use of the SBT in people receiving physical therapy for LBP and to describe patterns of change in clinical outcomes across the episode of care and among SBT categories.

Design: This study was a prospective case series.

Methods: A total of 214 patients receiving physical therapy for LBP were administered the SBT at the initial evaluation. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes included pain intensity and disability scores collected at each session. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and baseline characteristics among SBT categories were compared. Hierarchical linear mixed models were used to examine patterns of change in predicted outcomes across the episode of care.

Results: The patients' mean age was 44.3 years (SD=15.8), and 56.5% were women. The SBT categorized 33.2% of the patients as being at low risk, 47.7% as being at medium risk, and 19.2% as being at high risk. The high-risk category corresponded to the highest initial pain intensity and disability scores. The low-risk category corresponded to the lowest initial pain intensity and disability scores. Linear mixed models indicated different patterns of change in outcome scores for pain intensity (F=3.99) and disability (F=3.49) among SBT categories. Relative to the low-risk category, the high-risk category had larger improvements in predicted outcomes and the medium-risk category had similar improvements in predicted outcomes. Limitations The SBT was not administered to 24% of eligible patients. The timing of follow-up assessments was variable.

Conclusions: The SBT may provide important prognostic information for physical therapists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Invited commentary.
    Hill JC, Hay EM. Hill JC, et al. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):733-4; author reply 735-6. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100109.ic. Phys Ther. 2011. PMID: 21531942 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources