Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;100(5):542-7.
doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31820153d4.

Modification of shirt buttons for retrospective radiation dosimetry after a radiological event

Stephen A Marino  1 , Gary W Johnson, Peter B Schiff, David J Brenner
Affiliations

Modification of shirt buttons for retrospective radiation dosimetry after a radiological event

Stephen A Marino et al. Health Phys. 2011 May.

Abstract

Preliminary results are presented for a personal radiation dosimeter in the form of a clothing button to provide gamma-ray dose estimation for clinically-significant external radiation exposures to the general public due to a radiological incident, such as use of a radiological dispersal device. Rods of thermoluminescent material (LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P) were encapsulated in plastic "buttons," attached to shirts, and subjected to three cycles of home or commercial laundering or dry cleaning, including ironing or pressing. The buttons were subsequently exposed to doses of 137Cs gamma rays ranging from 0.75 to 8.2 Gy. The rods were removed from the buttons and their light output compared to their responses when bare or to the responses of a set of calibration rods of the same type and from the same manufacturer. In all three of the comparisons for LiF:Mg,Ti rods, the relative responses of the rods in buttons changed by 2-6% relative to the same rods before cleaning. In both comparisons for LiF:Mg,Cu,P rods, the response of laundered rods was 1-3% lower than for the same rods before cleaning. Both these materials are potential candidates for button dosimeters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photograph of the TLD “buttons”. L-R: top disc; bottom disc with slots for three TLD rods; bottom disc with TLD rods; bottom disc with TLD rods and holes for attaching the button to a shirt.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Light readings for LiF:Mg,Ti rods without application of ECCs before and after two methods of cleaning and for the calibration set when irradiated with the buttons. The data was fitted to second order polynomials due to the supralinear response of LiF:Ti,Mg at high doses. The first three curves listed in the legend are for Test 2 (Harshaw) and the second three curves are for Test 3 (Rexon). Error bars are the standard deviations of the readings.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Light readings for LiF:Mg,Cu,P rods without application of ECCs before and after two methods of cleaning, for the calibration set when irradiated with the buttons and for a group of rods from the same batch (cohort). The lines are linear least squares fits to the data. The first two curves listed in the legend are for Test 2 (Harshaw) and the bottom three curves are for Test 3 (Rexon). Error bars are the standard deviations of the readings.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ben Shachar B, Horowitz YS. Thermoluminescence in annealed and unannealed LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100, Harshaw) as a function of glow curve heating rate and using computerized glow curve deconvolution. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1992;25:694–703.
    1. Horowitz YS. The Annealing Characteristics of LiF:Mg,Ti. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1990;30:219–230.
    1. Kitis G, Tzima A, Cai GG, Furetta C. Low-temperature (80–240° C) annealing characteristics of LiF:Mg,Cu,P. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1996;29:1601–1612.
    1. Moscovitch M. Personnel dosimetry using LiF:Mg,Cu,P. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1999;85:49–56.
    1. Moscovitch M, St John TJ, Cassata JR, Blake PK, Rotunda JE, Ramlo M, Velbeck KJ, Luo LZ. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2006;119:248–254. - PubMed

Publication types