Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage
- PMID: 21452017
- PMCID: PMC3627533
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-011-0341-4
Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage
Abstract
Insurance coverage for mental health services has historically lagged behind other types of health services. We used a simulation exercise in which groups of laypersons deliberate about healthcare tradeoffs. Groups deciding for their "community" were more likely to select mental health coverage than individuals. Individual prioritization of mental health coverage, however, increased after group discussion. Participants discussed: value, cost and perceived need for mental health coverage, moral hazard and community benefit. A deliberative exercise in priority-setting led a significant proportion of persons to reconsider decisions about coverage for mental health services. Deliberations illustrated public-spiritedness, stigma and significant polarity of views.
Figures
References
-
- Aggarwal NK, Rowe M, Sernyak MA. Is health care a right or a commodity? Implementing mental health reform in a recession. Psychiatric Services. 2010;61:1144–1145. - PubMed
-
- Bartels L. Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science. 1996;40:194–230.
-
- Borinstein AB. Public attitudes toward persons with mental illness. Health Affairs. 1992;11:186–196. - PubMed
-
- Corrigan PW, Edwards AB, Green A, Diwan SL, Penn DL. Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2001a;27:219–225. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical