Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jun;25(6):661-72.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.66. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Preclinical aspects of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of wet AMD: ranibizumab and bevacizumab

Affiliations
Review

Preclinical aspects of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of wet AMD: ranibizumab and bevacizumab

C H Meyer et al. Eye (Lond). 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are currently used for the treatment of patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD): pegaptanib, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab. Ranibizumab is an antibody fragment approved for the treatment of wet AMD. Bevacizumab is a full-length antibody registered for use in oncology but unlicensed for wet AMD. However, it is used off-label worldwide not only for wet AMD but also for various other ocular diseases associated with macular edema and abnormal vessel growth. We consider aspects of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in relation to their molecular characteristics, in vitro and in vivo properties, and preclinical safety data. Before 2009, most studies described the short-term toxicity of bevacizumab in multiple cell types of the eye. Since 2009, an increasing number of studies have compared the properties of ranibizumab and bevacizumab and investigated their impact on retinal cell functioning. Compared with bevacizumab, ranibizumab neutralizes VEGF better at low concentrations, maintains efficacy for longer, and has a higher retinal penetration and potency. Studies in animals demonstrate ranibizumab to be better localized to the injected eye, whereas bevacizumab appears to have a greater effect in the fellow eye. In humans, a localized and systemic effect has been reported for both molecules. In conclusion, overlapping yet distinct pharmacological properties of ranibizumab and bevacizumab indicate that safety or efficacy data from one cannot be extrapolated to the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of ranibizumab and bevacizumab generation. CH, constant heavy domain; CL, constant light domain; VH, variable heavy domain; VL, variable light domain; CDR, complimentarity determining region; Fab, fragment antigen binding; Fc, fragment crystallizable.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Emerson MV, Lauer AK. Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2:377–388. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kroll P, Meyer CH. Which treatment is best for which AMD patient. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:128–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2606–2617. - PubMed
    1. Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Jr, Feinsod M, Guyer DR. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2805–2816. - PubMed
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419–1431. - PubMed

MeSH terms