Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Jul;15(7):713-5.
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199007000-00017.

A multicenter analysis of percutaneous discectomy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A multicenter analysis of percutaneous discectomy

N Kahanovitz et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jul.

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate a group of patients undergoing percutaneous discectomy. All patients had a single level unilateral L4-5 or L5-S1 disc herniation documented on either computer tomographic (CT) scan, myelogram, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Average follow-up after percutaneous discectomy was 16.8 months (range, 2-46 months). The average hospitalization time was 1.7 days (range, 1-5 days). Only 21 patients (55%) were able to return to work after the procedure. Thirteen patients ultimately underwent surgical discectomy for continued symptoms after the procedure. The additional 4 patients did not undergo surgical discectomy and never returned to work. Of those 25 percutaneous discectomy patients who did not undergo surgical discectomy, there was significantly more pain, residual weakness, and numbness compared with the patients undergoing surgical discectomy. The results of this study clearly indicate that percutaneous discectomy does not appear to be as predictable or successful a treatment modality as surgical discectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources