Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;17(4):304-8.
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0156. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Internet-based medical visit and diagnosis for common medical problems: experience of first user cohort

Affiliations

Internet-based medical visit and diagnosis for common medical problems: experience of first user cohort

Steven M Albert et al. Telemed J E Health. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objective: Internet-based medical visits, or "structured e-Visits," allow patients to report symptoms and seek diagnosis and treatment from their doctor over a secure Web site, without calling or visiting the physician's office. While acceptability of e-Visits has been investigated, outcomes associated with e-Visits, that is, whether patients receiving diagnoses receive appropriate care or need to return to the doctor, remain unexplored.

Materials and methods: The first 156 e-Visit users from a large family medicine practice were surveyed regarding their experience with the e-Visit and e-Visit outcomes. In addition, medical records for patients making e-Visits were reviewed to examine need for follow-up care within 7 days.

Results: Interviews were completed with 121 patients (77.6% participation). The most common type of e-Visit was for "other" symptoms or concerns (37%), followed by sinus/cold symptoms (35%). Back pain, urinary symptoms, cough, diarrhea, conjunctivitis, and vaginal irritation were each less frequent (<10%). A majority, 61% completed e-Visits with their own physician. The majority of patients (57.0%) reported receipt of a diagnosis without need for follow-up beyond a prescription; 75% of patients thought the e-Visit was as good as or better than an in-person visit, and only 11.6% felt that their concerns or questions were incompletely addressed. In a review of medical records, 16.9% had a follow-up visit within 7 days, mostly for the same condition. Four of these were on the same day as the e-Visit, including one emergency department visit.

Conclusions: Outcomes for the e-Visit suggest that it is an appropriate and potentially cost-saving addition to in-person delivery of primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Whitten P. Buis L. Love B. Physician-patient e-visit programs: Implementation and appropriateness. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2007;15:207–214.
    1. Tang PC. Black W. Young CY. Proposed criteria for reimbursing eVisits: Content analysis of secure patient messages in a personal health record system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:764–768. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergman D. Beck A. Rahm AK. The use of Internet-based technology to tailor well-child care encounters. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e37–e43. - PubMed
    1. Mehrotra A. Liu H. Adams JL. Wang MC. Lave JR. Thygeson NM. Solberg LI. McGlynn EA. Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:321–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergmo TS. Kummervold PE. Gammon D. Dahl LB. Electronic patient-provider communication: Will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? Int J Med Inform. 2005;9:705–710. - PubMed