Can midlevel health-care providers administer early medical abortion as safely and effectively as doctors? A randomised controlled equivalence trial in Nepal
- PMID: 21458058
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62229-5
Can midlevel health-care providers administer early medical abortion as safely and effectively as doctors? A randomised controlled equivalence trial in Nepal
Abstract
Background: Medical abortion is under-used in developing countries. We assessed whether early fi rst-trimester medical abortion provided by midlevel providers (government-trained, certified nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives) was as safe and effective as that provided by doctors in Nepal.
Methods: This multicentre randomised controlled equivalence trial was done in fi ve rural district hospitals in Nepal. Women were eligible for medical abortion if their pregnancy was of less than 9 weeks (63 days) and if they resided less than 90 min journey away from the study clinic. Women were ineligible if they had any contraindication to medical abortion. We used a computer-generated randomisation scheme stratified by study centre with a block size of six. Women were randomly assigned to a doctor or a midlevel provider for oral administration of 200 mg mifepristone followed by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally 2 days later, and followed up 10-4 days later. The primary endpoint was complete abortion without manual vacuum aspiration within 30 days of treatment. The study was not masked. Abortions were recorded as complete, incomplete, or failed (continuing pregnancy). Analyses for primary and secondary endpoints were by intention to treat, supplemented by per-protocol analysis of the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01186302.
Findings: Of 1295 women screened, 535 were randomly assigned to a doctor and 542 to a midlevel provider. 514 and 518, respectively, were included in the analyses of the primary endpoint. Abortions were judged complete in 504 (97.3%) women assigned to midlevel providers and in 494 (96.1%) assigned to physicians. The risk difference for complete abortion was 1.24% (95% CI -0.53 to 3.02), which falls within the predefined equivalence range (-5% to 5%). Five cases (1%) were recorded as failed abortion in the doctor cohort and none in the midlevel provider cohort; the remaining cases were recorded as incomplete abortions. No serious complications were noted.
Interpretation: The provision of medical abortion up to 9 weeks’ gestation by midlevel providers and doctors was similar in safety and effectiveness. Where permitted by law, appropriately trained midlevel health-care providers can provide safe, low-technology medical abortion services for women independently from doctors.
Funding: UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research (RHR), World Health Organization.
Comment in
-
Midlevel health-care providers key to MDG 5.Lancet. 2011 Apr 2;377(9772):1127-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60166-9. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21458059 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Midlevel health-care providers key to MDG 5.Lancet. 2011 Apr 2;377(9772):1127-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60166-9. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 21458059 No abstract available.
-
Comparative satisfaction of receiving medical abortion service from nurses and auxiliary nurse-midwives or doctors in Nepal: results of a randomized trial.Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 16;14(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0438-7. Reprod Health. 2017. PMID: 29246235 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191174. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29351313 Free PMC article.
-
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32150279 Free PMC article.
-
Early abortion. Update and implications for midwifery practice.J Nurse Midwifery. 1998 Nov-Dec;43(6):492-501. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(98)00057-3. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998. PMID: 9871382 Review.
Cited by
-
Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518672. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672. Epub 2025 Aug 6. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025. PMID: 40576098 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The case for the use of telehealth for abortion in India.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):1920566. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1920566. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021. PMID: 34078249 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion-related care and the role of the midwife: a global perspective.Int J Womens Health. 2018 Nov 23;10:751-762. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S178601. eCollection 2018. Int J Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 30538585 Free PMC article.
-
Nurse versus physician-provision of early medical abortion in Mexico: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Apr 1;93(4):249-58. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.143990. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Bull World Health Organ. 2015. PMID: 26229189 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Medical Abortion Provided by Nurse-Midwives or Physicians in a High Resource Setting: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158645. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27362270 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical