Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future?
- PMID: 21458151
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.021
Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future?
Abstract
Background: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) uses natural orifices to access the abdominal cavity. We adapted NOTES to perform transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors.
Objective: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of this procedure and compare it with conventional laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN).
Design, setting, and participants: From July 2009 to October 2010, 20 women underwent transvaginal NOTES-assisted living donor nephrectomy (LDN) in our centre. We compared the prospectively collected clinical data of each donor with those of a contemporaneous matched pair of conventional LLDNs (40 donors).
Surgical procedure: The procedure was performed using three abdominal trocars and one trocar through the vaginal wall.
Measurements: Variables evaluated for donors were procedure length, blood loss, warm ischaemia time (WIT), complications, hospital stay, and first-month creatinine nadir. In the transvaginal LDN group, sexual function was assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire before and after surgery. Variables evaluated for recipients were complications, graft function, and creatinine evolution.
Results and limitations: The procedure was completed in all cases. Operative variables were similar for both groups except for WIT, which was longer in the transvaginal LDN group (p<0.001) without consequences for graft functioning. One transvaginal LDN case had postoperative bleeding requiring immediate open surgery. All transvaginal LDN donors reported unaltered sexual function after surgery and satisfaction with the results. All recipients had immediate urine output, and all had a functioning graft at last follow-up except for one recipient of the transvaginal LDN group who required transplantectomy. Despite promising results, randomised controlled studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further elucidate the potential of this novel technique.
Conclusions: Transvaginal NOTES-assisted LDN appears to be a feasible and reproducible surgical technique. The WIT was longer in the transvaginal group, and there was no effect on graft function after the short follow-up.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Nephrectomy in a Series of 63 Cases: Stepwise Transition From Hybrid to Pure NOTES.Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25837534
-
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted minilaparoscopic nephrectomy: a step towards scarless surgery.Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.038. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 20950937
-
Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 19664877
-
[NOTES. History and current situation of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Spain].Cir Esp. 2010 Oct;88(4):222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.03.046. Epub 2010 Jul 27. Cir Esp. 2010. PMID: 20667526 Review. Spanish.
-
Surgery via natural orifices in human beings: yesterday, today, tomorrow.Am J Surg. 2012 Jul;204(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Dec 28. Am J Surg. 2012. PMID: 22206853 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):496-505. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0346-5. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23740382 Review.
-
What about vaginal extraction of the kidney? results of an online survey.Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):78-82. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0170. Int Braz J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27136470 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of hemodynamic and inflammatory changes between transoral and transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery.PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e50338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050338. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23300944 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay.Arab J Urol. 2018 Mar 6;16(3):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.01.003. eCollection 2018 Sep. Arab J Urol. 2018. PMID: 30140467 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complications in Transvaginal Approach in Laparoscopic Surgery.Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):853-62. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1038-1. Epub 2014 Feb 5. Indian J Surg. 2015. PMID: 27011470 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical