Configuration specificity of crowding in peripheral vision
- PMID: 21458478
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.016
Configuration specificity of crowding in peripheral vision
Abstract
Peripheral vision is characterized in part by poor spatial resolution and impaired visual performance, particularly when the object is surrounded by flanking elements, a phenomenon popularly known as "crowding". Crowding scales with eccentricity irrespective of the target size, both in terms of magnitude and spatial extent, which is determined by varying the target-flanker separation. However, the extent to which crowding depends upon the flanking stimuli parameters alone without separating target and flankers is poorly understood. In the present study, we investigated the effect of flanking stimulus parameters on crowding in orientation and contrast discrimination tasks using closely located "chain" lateral Gabor stimuli in order to enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of crowding in peripheral vision. We found a strong configural effect on crowding in both orientation and contrast discrimination tasks, with reduced crowding when the flanker parameters enhanced the target salience and increased crowding when the flankers were perceptually grouped with the target. While in orientation discrimination crowding was dependent on eccentricity, and in contrast discrimination it was dependent on flanker contrast and eccentricity, crowding showed little dependence on the number of flankers in either task. We conclude that crowding in peripheral orientation and contrast discrimination is configuration specific, which can be reduced without alterations to the target-flanker separation and that crowding is a combination of low-level as well as high-level cortical processing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Configuration influence on crowding.J Vis. 2007 Feb 5;7(2):4.1-12. doi: 10.1167/7.2.4. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 18217819
-
Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding.J Vis. 2009 Feb 6;9(2):5.1-11. doi: 10.1167/9.2.5. J Vis. 2009. PMID: 19271915
-
Discrimination of natural scenes in central and peripheral vision.Vision Res. 2011 Jul 15;51(14):1686-98. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 27. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 21640747
-
Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review.J Vis. 2011 Dec 1;11(5):13. doi: 10.1167/11.5.13. J Vis. 2011. PMID: 22207654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seven Myths on Crowding and Peripheral Vision.Iperception. 2020 May 19;11(3):2041669520913052. doi: 10.1177/2041669520913052. eCollection 2020 May-Jun. Iperception. 2020. PMID: 32489576 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The same binding in contour integration and crowding.J Vis. 2011 Jul 14;11(8):10.1167/11.8.10 10. doi: 10.1167/11.8.10. J Vis. 2011. PMID: 21757504 Free PMC article.
-
The Irreducibility of Vision: Gestalt, Crowding and the Fundamentals of Vision.Vision (Basel). 2022 Jun 15;6(2):35. doi: 10.3390/vision6020035. Vision (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35737422 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Typical magnitude and spatial extent of crowding in autism.J Vis. 2016;16(5):17. doi: 10.1167/16.5.17. J Vis. 2016. PMID: 26998801 Free PMC article.
-
Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1022-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035377. Epub 2013 Dec 23. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014. PMID: 24364703 Free PMC article.
-
Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.J Vis. 2015;15(6):5. doi: 10.1167/15.6.5. J Vis. 2015. PMID: 26024452 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources