Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;127(4):1428-1436.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d0d4.

Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction

Salih Colakoglu  1 , Ibrahim Khansa, Michael S Curtis, Janet H Yueh, Adeyemi Ogunleye, Carin Haewyon, Adam M Tobias, Bernard T Lee
Affiliations

Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction

Salih Colakoglu et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The development of a complication after surgery can be difficult for both patient and surgeon. With a growing body of literature evaluating patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction, few studies directly focus on the impact of surgical complications on satisfaction. This study analyzed the effect of complications on general and aesthetic satisfaction after breast reconstruction.

Methods: All women at an academic institution undergoing breast reconstruction between 1999 and 2006 were identified. Patient demographics and history of complications were collected. A questionnaire adapted from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Survey was administered examining general and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients with complications were compared with patients with no complications.

Results: Overall, 716 women underwent 932 reconstructions; 233 patients had a complication. Patient demographics and response rate were similar between the two groups (overall response rate 75.4 percent). Development of a complication correlated with increased odds of aesthetic dissatisfaction (odds ratio = 1.61, p = 0.047). Other predictors of dissatisfaction were older age, reconstruction with an implant, and a longer time interval between reconstruction and survey, while autologous reconstruction was a predictor of satisfaction. Among patients with a complication, implant reconstruction and mastectomy for prophylaxis were significant predictors of dissatisfaction.

Conclusions: Aesthetic satisfaction after breast reconstruction is lower in patients developing a complication, older patients, and those receiving an implant reconstruction. Furthermore, patients with a prophylactic mastectomy are more likely than those with a therapeutic mastectomy to be dissatisfied when complications arise. These relationships are important, as measures to improve quality and decrease complications can directly improve patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bloom J. Psychological aspects of breast cancer study group: Psychological response to mastectomy—A prospective comparison. Cancer 1987;59:189–196.
    1. Goin M, Goin J. Psychological reactions to prophylactic mastectomy synchronous with contralateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70:355–359.
    1. Reaby LL. Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1810–1818.
    1. Kovacs L, Papadopulos NA, Ammar SA, et al. Clinical outcome and patients' satisfaction after simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:199–204.
    1. Noguchi M, Earashi M, Ohta N, et al. Mastectomy with and without immediate breast reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap. Am J Surg. 1993;166:279–283.

LinkOut - more resources