Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;91(3):279-83.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-1049.

Utility of non-rule-based visual matching as a strategy to allow novices to achieve skin lesion diagnosis

Affiliations

Utility of non-rule-based visual matching as a strategy to allow novices to achieve skin lesion diagnosis

R Benjamin Aldridge et al. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011 May.

Abstract

Non-analytical reasoning is thought to play a key role in dermatology diagnosis. Considering its potential importance, surprisingly little work has been done to research whether similar identification processes can be supported in non-experts. We describe here a prototype diagnostic support software, which we have used to examine the ability of medical students (at the beginning and end of a dermatology attachment) and lay volunteers, to diagnose 12 images of common skin lesions. Overall, the non-experts using the software had a diagnostic accuracy of 98% (923/936) compared with 33% for the control group (215/648) (Wilcoxon p < 0.0001). We have demonstrated, within the constraints of a simplified clinical model, that novices' diagnostic scores are significantly increased by the use of a structured image database coupled with matching of index and referent images. The novices achieve this high degree of accuracy without any use of explicit definitions of likeness or rule-based strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screenshots from the software showing how a correct diagnostic match could be made for index/test image 11 (a seborrhoeic keratosis). The boxes highlight the user’s selections at each of the three levels. A video of the software in action is available to view on YouTube (14).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Plot of all 60 students’ scores by group and test date, and the 20 lay novices’ scores. The maximum score of 12 is achieved by correctly identifying all the test images. Day 1 control group (n = 28, median score 1), Day 10 control group (n = 26, median score 6), Day 1 software group (n = 30, median score 12), Day 10 software group (n = 28, median score 12). Lay group score (n = 20, median score 12).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Norman G, Eva K, Brooks L, Hamstra S. Expertise in Medicine and Surgery. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press; New York: 2006. pp. 339–354.
    1. Norman GR, Rosenthal D, Brooks LR, Allen SW, Muzzin LJ. The development of expertise in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1063–1068. - PubMed
    1. Brooks LR, Norman GR, Allen SW. Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. J Exp Psychol: General. 1991;120:278–287. - PubMed
    1. Norman G, Brooks LR. The non-analytical basis of clinical reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1997;2:173–184. - PubMed
    1. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Medical Educ. 2007;41:1140–1145. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms