Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;39(3):147-57.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0340-5.

Behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs on the eve of parity

Affiliations

Behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs on the eve of parity

Rachel L Garfield et al. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May.

Abstract

The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) plays a vital role in financing behavioral health services for low-income children. This study examines behavioral health benefit design and management in separate CHIP programs on the eve of federal requirements for behavioral health parity. Even before parity implementation, many state CHIP programs did not impose service limits or cost sharing for behavioral health benefits. However, a substantial share of states imposed limits or cost sharing that might hinder access to care. The majority of states use managed care to administer behavioral health benefits. It is important to monitor how states adapt their programs to comply with parity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Day/visit limits for behavioral health benefits in separate CHIP plans as of 2009. Note: Inpatient limits are measured in days/year; outpatient limits are measured in visits/year. States whose limits vary by income or plan (ID, IA, NJ, WI) were categorized by most generous limit in the state. Some states’ limits apply to combined MH/SA services (inpatient: NY, ND, WV; outpatient: NH, NY, NC, VA, WV) or combined BH/physical health services (PA). AR covers SA services only when the primary diagnosis is mental illness. “Other limit” includes: ME (2/3 h/week limit for outpatient MH/SA services); MS ($8000 limit on inpatient and outpatient SA per benefit period); MT ($6000/year & $12,000/lifetime limit on inpatient and outpatient SA); TX (12 weeks/year outpatient SA limit); VA (90 days/lifetime inpatient SA limit); WY ($6,000/year limit for combined inpatient/outpatient SA treatment). Source: Authors’ analysis of information collected from state policymakers, state CHIP plans, and state program/benefits information
Fig 2
Fig 2
Co-payments for behavioral health benefits in separate CHIP plans as of 2009. Note: In states where cost sharing varies by family income, highest possible cost sharing level is used to group state. “Full cost” indicates that service is not covered and families may face entire cost for services. Other cost sharing includes UT, where the highest income group pays 20% of total after deductible ($500 per child or $1,500 per family) for inpatient services. Source: Authors’ analysis of information collected from state policymakers, state CHIP plans, and state program/benefits information
Fig 3
Fig 3
Coverage of behavioral health services in separate CHIP programs, 2009. Source: Authors’ analysis of information collected from state policymakers, state CHIP plans, and state program/benefits information

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1995;36(1):1–10. - PubMed
    1. Artiga S, O’Malley M. Increasing premiums and cost sharing in Medicaid and SCHIP: Recent state experiences. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; 2005. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from http://www.kff.org/medicaid/7322.cfm.
    1. Azrin ST, et al. Impact of full mental health and substance abuse parity for children in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Pediatrics. 2007;119(2):e452–e459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry CL. The evolution of mental health parity. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2006;14(4):185–194. - PubMed
    1. Barry CL, Busch SH. Do state parity laws reduce the financial burden on families of children with mental health care needs? Health Services Research. 2007;42(3):1061–1084. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms