Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;3(4):539-56.
doi: 10.2217/imt.11.20.

Immunity and immune suppression in human ovarian cancer

Affiliations

Immunity and immune suppression in human ovarian cancer

Claudia C Preston et al. Immunotherapy. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer are heterogeneous, independent of common features such as stage, response to therapy and grade. This disparity in outcomes warrants further exploration into tumor and host characteristics. One compelling issue is the response of the patient's immune system to her ovarian cancer. Several studies have confirmed a prominent role for the immune system in modifying disease course. This has led to the identification and evaluation of novel immune-modulating therapeutic approaches such as vaccination and antibody therapy. Antitumor immunity, however, is often negated by immune suppression mechanisms present in the tumor microenvironment. Thus, in the future, research into immunotherapy targeting ovarian cancer will probably become increasingly focused on combination approaches that simultaneously augment immunity while preventing local immune suppression. In this article, we summarize important immunological issues that could influence ovarian cancer outcome, including tumor antigens, endogenous immune responses, immune escape and new and developing immunotherapeutic strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Immune microenvironment in ovarian cancer
Despite the presence of various immune effector cells (i.e., CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells and NK cells) that can attack the tumor, the presence of a complex immune suppressive network including Tregs, ImDCs and MDSCs along with their mediators (i.e., IL-10, TGF-β, B7-H1, PD-1 and arginase) effectively halts the antitumor immunity. DC: Dendritic cell; FR: Folate receptor; IGFBP: IGF binding protein; ImDC: Immature DC; MDSC: Myeloid-derived suppressor cell; PD: Programmed death.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300. - PubMed
    1. Aletti GD, Gallenberg MM, Cliby WA, et al. Current management strategies for ovarian cancer. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2007;82(6):751–770. - PubMed
    1. Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351(24):2519–2529. - PubMed
    1. Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21(17):3194–3200. - PubMed
    1. Winter WE, 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25(24):3621–3627. - PubMed

Publication types