Histopathologic evaluation of subcutaneous tissue response to three endodontic sealers in rats
- PMID: 21467810
- DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.53.15
Histopathologic evaluation of subcutaneous tissue response to three endodontic sealers in rats
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the subcutaneous biocompatibility of three root canal sealers in rats. Thirty Wistar rats were divided into three groups according to three time periods (15, 30 and 60 days). Sterilized polyethylene tubes filled with root canal sealers (AH Plus, Epiphany & Grossman), and one empty tube (control) were implanted into four separate dorsal regions in each rat. At the end of each study period, 10 animals were sacrificed, and histologic sections of connective tissue at the open ends of the tubes were prepared. Severity of tissue inflammatory response was assessed. Grossman endodontic sealer had the most severe inflammatory response followed by the AH Plus, Epiphany and control groups. The tissue inflammatory response of the Epiphany and AH Plus sealers was not significantly different. Thus, Epiphany sealer showed acceptable biocompatibility when tested on rat subcutaneous tissue.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers.J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 12. J Endod. 2009. PMID: 19166779
-
Biocompatibility of four root canal sealers: a histopathological evaluation in rat subcutaneous connective tissue.Braz Dent J. 2011;22(1):21-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000100003. Braz Dent J. 2011. PMID: 21519643
-
Reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to a mineral trioxide aggregate-based and a zinc oxide and eugenol sealer.J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jul 6. J Endod. 2012. PMID: 22892741
-
Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers.Dent Mater J. 2020 Sep 29;39(5):703-720. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-288. Epub 2020 Mar 24. Dent Mater J. 2020. PMID: 32213767 Review.
-
A Review of the research methods and progress of biocompatibility evaluation of root canal sealers.Aust Endod J. 2023 Sep;49 Suppl 1:508-514. doi: 10.1111/aej.12725. Epub 2022 Dec 8. Aust Endod J. 2023. PMID: 36480411 Review.
Cited by
-
Subcutaneous Connective Tissue Reaction to a New Nano Zinc-Oxide Eugenol Sealer in Rat Model.Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):64-69. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.13. Iran Endod J. 2017. PMID: 28179927 Free PMC article.
-
Cytotoxicity and subcutaneous tissue response of beta RCS in comparison with ADSeal and AH plus endodontic sealers: in vitro/in vivo study.Saudi Dent J. 2025 Jun 3;37(4-6):13. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00013-2. Saudi Dent J. 2025. PMID: 40457132 Free PMC article.
-
Biocompatibility of Acetazolamide and Its Association with Calcium Hydroxide in Rat Subcutaneous Tissue.Iran Endod J. 2018 Fall;13(4):515-521. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i4.21059. Iran Endod J. 2018. PMID: 36883020 Free PMC article.
-
Biocompatibility of a new epoxy resin-based root canal sealer in subcutaneous tissue of rat.Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):31-35. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.149635. Eur J Dent. 2015. PMID: 25713481 Free PMC article.
-
A study on biocompatibility of three endodontic sealers: intensity and duration of tissue irritation.Iran Endod J. 2014 Spring;9(2):137-43. Epub 2014 Mar 8. Iran Endod J. 2014. PMID: 24688584 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources