Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;17(4):661-7; quiz 766.
doi: 10.3201/eid1704.101461.

Mumps complications and effects of mumps vaccination, England and Wales, 2002-2006

Affiliations

Mumps complications and effects of mumps vaccination, England and Wales, 2002-2006

Chee Fu Yung et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

We analyzed data from hospital admissions and enhanced mumps surveillance to assess mumps complications during the largest mumps outbreak in England and Wales, 2004-2005, and their association with mumps vaccination. When compared with nonoutbreak periods, the outbreak was associated with a clear increase in hospitalized patients with orchitis, meningitis, and pancreatitis. Routine mumps surveillance and hospital data showed that 6.1% of estimated mumps patients were hospitalized, 4.4% had orchitis, 0.35% meningitis, and 0.33% pancreatitis. Enhanced surveillance data showed 2.9% of mumps patients were hospitalized, 6.1% had orchitis, 0.3% had meningitis, and 0.25% had pancreatitis. Risk was reduced for hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.68), mumps orchitis (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93) and mumps meningitis (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.56) when patient had received 1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. The protective effect of vaccination on disease severity is critical in assessing the total effects of current and future mumps control strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Total estimated number of cases of mumps and hospital episodes coded to mumps, England and Wales, April 1, 2002–March 31, 2006.

Comment in

  • Mumps vaccine effectiveness against orchitis.
    Hahné S, Whelan J, van Binnendijk R, Swaan C, Fanoy E, Boot H, de Melker H. Hahné S, et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;18(1):191-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1801.111178. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 22260843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Health Protection Agency. Mumps [cited 2010 Nov 8]. http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/InfectiousDiseases/InfectionsAZ/Mumps/Gener...
    1. Gupta RK, Best J, MacMahon E. Mumps and the UK epidemic 2005. BMJ. 2005;330:1132–5. 10.1136/bmj.330.7500.1132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hviid A, Rubin S, Muhlemann K. Mumps. Lancet. 2008;371:932–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60419-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA. Mumps vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, editors. Vaccines. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.
    1. Mumps virus vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2007;82:51–60. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources