Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality assurance
- PMID: 21470797
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality assurance
Abstract
Purpose: To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA.
Methods and materials: Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements.
Results: Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, -0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, -1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans.
Conclusions: After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Patient-specific 3D pretreatment and potential 3D online dose verification of Monte Carlo-calculated IMRT prostate treatment plans.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):1168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Nov 17. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. PMID: 21093168
-
A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans.Med Dosim. 2014 Winter;39(4):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 20. Med Dosim. 2014. PMID: 24958705
-
Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 6;14(2):3929. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.3929. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 23470927 Free PMC article.
-
Applications of machine and deep learning to patient-specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep;22(9):20-36. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13375. Epub 2021 Aug 3. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 34343412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A six-year review of more than 13,000 patient-specific IMRT QA results from 13 different treatment sites.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 8;15(5):4935. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4935. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 25207581 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Investigation on the effect of sharp phantom edges on point dose measurement during patient-specific dosimetry with Rapid Arc.J Med Phys. 2013 Jul;38(3):139-42. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.116373. J Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 24049321 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation and improvement of angular response for a commercial 2D detector array for patient-specific QA.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Sep;24(9):e14106. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14106. Epub 2023 Aug 18. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 37593989 Free PMC article.
-
A novel angular dependency model for MatriXX response and its application to true composite dose verification for IMRT plans.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):120-135. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13405. Epub 2021 Aug 28. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021. PMID: 34453876 Free PMC article.
-
Angular dependence correction of MatriXX and its application to composite dose verification.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Sep 6;13(5):3856. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3856. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012. PMID: 22955651 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 8;15(6):4994. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4994. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 25493524 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous