A prospective, randomized evaluation of a novel everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the PLATINUM (a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Assess an Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System [PROMUS Element] for the Treatment of Up to Two de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) trial
- PMID: 21470815
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.016
A prospective, randomized evaluation of a novel everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the PLATINUM (a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Assess an Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System [PROMUS Element] for the Treatment of Up to Two de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) trial
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes with a novel platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) compared with a predicate cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated an excellent safety and efficacy profile for the CoCr-EES. The PtCr-EES uses the identical antiproliferative agent and polymer but with a novel platinum chromium scaffold designed for enhanced deliverability, vessel conformability, side-branch access, radiopacity, radial strength, and fracture resistance.
Methods: A total of 1,530 patients undergoing PCI of 1 or 2 de novo native lesions were randomized at 132 worldwide sites to CoCr-EES (n = 762) or PtCr-EES (n = 768). The primary endpoint was the 12-month rate of target lesion failure (TLF), the composite of target vessel-related cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the per-protocol population (patients who received ≥1 assigned study stent), powered for noninferiority.
Results: The 12-month rate of TLF in the per-protocol population occurred in 2.9% versus 3.4% of patients assigned to CoCr-EES versus PtCr-EES, respectively (difference: 0.5%, 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 2.3%, p(noninferiority) = 0.001, p(superiority) = 0.60). By intention-to-treat, there were no significant differences between CoCr-EES and PtCr-EES in the 12-month rates of TLF (3.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.72), cardiac death or MI (2.5% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.56), TLR (1.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.96), or Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00).
Conclusions: In this large-scale, prospective, single-blind randomized trial, a novel PtCr-EES was noninferior to the predicate CoCr-EES for TLF, with nonsignificant differences in measures of safety and efficacy through 12-month follow-up after PCI.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00823212.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19171853 Clinical Trial.
-
Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1362-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Feb 15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22341736 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized comparison of platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents versus cobalt chromium-based Zotarolimus-Eluting stents in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: HOST-ASSURE (harmonizing optimal strategy for treatment of coronary artery stenosis-safety & effectiveness of drug-eluting stents & anti-platelet regimen), a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt A):2805-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 May 7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24814486 Clinical Trial.
-
Current status of the Xience V® everolimus-eluting coronary stent system.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Oct;8(10):1363-74. doi: 10.1586/erc.10.127. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010. PMID: 20936921 Review.
-
Rapamycin analogs for stent-based local drug delivery. Everolimus- and tacrolimus-eluting stents.Herz. 2004 Mar;29(2):162-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-004-2556-6. Herz. 2004. PMID: 15054588 Review.
Cited by
-
A Quality by Design Approach to Developing and Manufacturing Polymeric Nanoparticle Drug Products.AAPS J. 2016 Nov;18(6):1354-1365. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9969-z. Epub 2016 Sep 8. AAPS J. 2016. PMID: 27631558 Review.
-
Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the American College of Cardiology Congress 2011.Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 Jun;100(6):475-82. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0322-3. Epub 2011 Apr 23. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21516320
-
Clinical safety and effectiveness of the Genoss drug-eluting stent in real-world clinical practice.Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):683-691. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.129. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Korean J Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37423255 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40649017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Uniform and accelerated degradation of pure iron patterned by Pt disc arrays.Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 1;6:23627. doi: 10.1038/srep23627. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27033380 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous