Survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia: comparisons of estimates from clinical trial settings and population-based cancer registries
- PMID: 21471276
- PMCID: PMC3228188
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0393
Survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia: comparisons of estimates from clinical trial settings and population-based cancer registries
Abstract
Introduction: The survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) has improved during the past decades. However, there have been discrepancies between results reported from clinical trials and population-based studies. We aimed to elucidate the extent of these discrepancies.
Methods: We examined the 5-year survival rate of patients in clinical trials of CML treatment and compared these results with the survival of patients in the general population using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, correcting for differences in the age structure of the patient populations.
Results: Twenty-nine trials were identified for data extraction. The survival rate calculated from SEER data was lower than the survival rate in clinical trials in the corresponding period, with differences of 2.1%-50.7%. Age-adapted survival was similar for four trials, but differences up to 35.8% were seen in most. Limitations of the study include the lack of information on chemotherapy in the SEER database and possible heterogeneity of cases.
Discussion: The survival rate in clinical trials of CML treatment is higher than the survival rate of all patients with CML. We speculate that the difference may be a result of access to better medications, selection of healthier patients for trials, and the time necessary for adoption of new treatments. This finding underscores the need for population-based studies to give a more realistic idea of survival for patients with a given malignancy in the general population.
Conflict of interest statement
The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the authors or independent peer reviewers.
Figures
References
-
- Svensson CK. Representation of American blacks in clinical trials of new drugs. JAMA. 1989;261:263–265. - PubMed
-
- Heiat A, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Representation of the elderly, women, minorities in heart failure clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1682–1688. - PubMed
-
- Yessaian A, Mendivil AA, Brewster WR. Population characteristics in cervical cancer trials: Search for external validity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:407–413. - PubMed
-
- Begg CB, Engstrom PF. Eligibility and extrapolation in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5:962–968. - PubMed
-
- Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent trends in long-term survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia: Disclosing the impact of advances in therapy on the population level. Haematologica. 2008;93:1544–1549. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
