Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;25(3):505-15.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101959.

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier permeability in Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier permeability in Alzheimer's disease

Sonia Chalbot et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011.

Abstract

The role of blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been addressed but not yet established. We evaluated the BCB integrity in 179 samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) retrospectively collected from AD patients and control cases using both CSF/serum albumin ratio (QAlb) and CSF secretory Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) activity. These analyses were supplemented with the measurement of total tau, amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ1-42), and ubiquitin CSF levels. We found that due to its higher sensitivity, CSF sPLA2 activity could 1) discriminate AD from healthy controls and 2) showed BCB impairment in neurological control cases while QAlb could not. Moreover, the CSF sPLA2 activity measurement showed that around half of the AD patients were characterized by a BCB impairment. The BCB dysfunction observed in AD was independent from Mini-Mental State Examination score as well as CSF levels of total tau, Aβ1-42, and ubiquitin. Finally, the BCB dysfunction was not limited to any of the CSF biomarkers-based previously identified subgroups of AD. These results suggest that the BCB damage occurs independent of and probably precedes both Aβ and tau pathologies in a restricted subgroup of AD patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of sPLA2 activity with QAlb in AD and control groups. A) There was a significant difference in sPLA2 activity (F(2,91) = 6.788; p = 0.002) but not in QAlb (F(2,89) = 0.369; p = 0.693) between H-Control45–75 years group and ND-Control45–75 years or AD45–75 year group. Data are shown as mean±SD; B) Bland-Altman analysis showing the agreement between QAlb and sPLA2 activity for the measurement of BCB impairment in 158 clinically diagnosed AD or non-demented cases. QAlb and CSF sPLA2 activity are normalized to the average of all values of the corresponding parameters and converted to percentage. The mean difference±2 SDs are represented by horizontal solid and dotted lines, respectively. C) Proportion of patients with normal and abnormally increased sPLA2 activity in H-Control45–75 years (n = 21), ND-Control45–75 years (n = 19), AD45–75 years (n = 54) and AD>75 years (n = 85) using the cutoff value of 4.82 ΔFI/min.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicating the discriminating ability of CSF measurements of sPLA2 activity, QAlb, T-tau, Aβ1–42, Ubiquitin and T-tau/Aβ1–42 ratio A) in patients with AD45–75 years (n = 54) versus controls (n = 40), and B) in patients with AD45–75 years (n = 54) versus H-Control45–75 years (n = 21). The optimal cutoff levels, sensitivity, specificity and AUC are shown in Table 2. T-tau, total tau.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
sPLA2 activity in AD subgroups and effects of gender, age, MMSE, ApoE4 genotype, total tau, Aβ1–42, and ubiquitin on this activity. A) Iqbal’s Decision Tree [25] employed for identifying various AD subgroups based on CSF levels of T-tau, Aβ1–42 and ubiquitin; B) Proportion of patients with normal and abnormally increased sPLA2 activity in HARO (n = 11), ATEO (n = 24), AELO (n = 71) and LEBALO (n = 32) AD subgroups using the cutoff value of 4.82 ΔFI/min. C) Gender and ApoE4 proportion as well as MMSE, Age, and CSF levels of T-tau, Aβ1–42, Ubiquitin, QAlb, and sPLA2 activity in AD patients with normal (n = 92) and abnormally increased (n = 46) sPLA2 activity. Categorical data were assessed using Fisher’s test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD. Differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney’s test (MMSE, age, T-tau, Aβ1–42, and Ubiquitin) or Student’s t-test (QAlb and sPLA2 activity). Statistical differences are indicated by an asterisk. T-tau, total tau.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Choi YK, Kim KW. Blood-neural barrier: its diversity and coordinated cell-to-cell communication. BMB Rep. 2008;41:345–352. - PubMed
    1. Bowman GL, Kaye JA, Moore M, Waichunas D, Carlson NE, Quinn JF. Blood-brain barrier impairment in Alzheimer disease: stability and functional significance. Neurology. 2007;68:1809–1814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stolp HB, Dziegielewska KM. Review: Role of developmental inflammation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35:132–146. - PubMed
    1. Farrall AJ, Wardlaw JM. Blood-brain barrier: ageing and microvascular disease – systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:337–352. - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Golob EJ, Su MY. Vascular volume and blood-brain barrier permeability measured by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in hippocampus and cerebellum of patients with MCI and normal controls. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:695–700. - PubMed

Publication types