Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee
- PMID: 2147184
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2147184
Biomechanics of a double prosthetic ligament in the anterior cruciate deficient knee
Abstract
We have assessed the biomechanical properties of a 'double-bundle' prosthetic ligament replacing the anterior cruciate in cadaver knees. We compared the results with those of single bundle 'over-the-top' and 'through-the-condyle' techniques, performing anterior drawer tests at 20 degrees and 90 degrees knee flexion. The over-the-top reconstruction gave better anteroposterior stability at 20 degrees, while the through-the-condyle repair was more stable at 90 degrees. The double-bundle reconstruction gave practically normal anterior stability at both 20 degrees and 90 degrees.
Similar articles
-
Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement.Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1825-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546504263947. Am J Sports Med. 2004. PMID: 15572308
-
In vivo kinematic evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2172-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514538958. Epub 2014 Jun 24. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24961443
-
Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: anatomic and biomechanical rationale.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Feb;15(2):87-96. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200702000-00003. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007. PMID: 17277255 Review.
-
An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 1: Secondary Role of the Anterolateral Ligament in the Setting of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):585-92. doi: 10.1177/0363546515618387. Epub 2015 Dec 18. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26684663 Clinical Trial.
-
Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science.Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1789-99. doi: 10.1177/0363546511402659. Epub 2011 May 19. Am J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 21596902 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of dynamic rotational knee instability between anatomic single-bundle and over-the-top anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using triaxial accelerometry.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2499-7. Epub 2013 Apr 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 23568389
-
Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Mar 12;32(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00033-8. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32660562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year followup?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):824-34. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1940-9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 21667181 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Peri-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femur fracture: a biomechanical analysis of the femoral tunnel as a stress riser.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Dec;19 Suppl 1:S77-85. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1527-8. Epub 2011 May 12. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011. PMID: 21562843
-
In vitro and intraoperative laxities after single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.Arthroscopy. 2011 Jun;27(6):849-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.12.003. Arthroscopy. 2011. PMID: 21624681 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources