Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep;28(5):489-501.
doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.03.018. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

Antibodies in infectious diseases: polyclonals, monoclonals and niche biotechnology

Affiliations
Review

Antibodies in infectious diseases: polyclonals, monoclonals and niche biotechnology

Jody D Berry et al. N Biotechnol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Antibody preparations have a long history of providing protection from infectious diseases. Although antibodies remain the only natural host-derived defense mechanism capable of completely preventing infection, as products, they compete against inexpensive therapeutics such as antibiotics, small molecule inhibitors and active vaccines. The continued discovery in the monoclonal antibody (mAb) field of leads with broadened cross neutralization of viruses and demonstrable synergy of antibody with antibiotics for bacterial diseases, clearly show that innovation remains. The commercial success of mAbs in chronic disease has not been paralleled in infectious diseases for several reasons. Infectious disease immunotherapeutics are limited in scope as endemic diseases necessitate active vaccine development. Also, the complexity of these small markets draws the interest of niche companies rather than big pharmaceutical corporations. Lastly, the cost of goods for mAb therapeutics is inherently high for infectious agents due to the need for antibody cocktails, which better mimic polyclonal immunoglobulin preparations and prevent antigenic escape. In cases where vaccine or convalescent populations are available, current polyclonal hyperimmune immunoglobulin preparations (pIgG), with modern and highly efficient purification technology and standardized assays for potency, can make economic sense. Recent innovations to broaden the potency of mAb therapies, while reducing cost of production, are discussed herein. On the basis of centuries of effective use of Ab treatments, and with growing immunocompromised populations, the question is not whether antibodies have a bright future for infectious agents, but rather what formats are cost effective and generate safe and efficacious treatments to satisfy regulatory approval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Antibody effector mechanisms used to combat microorganisms mediated by the various isotypes of human immunoglobulin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Exploiting recombinant technology to address monospecificity issues surrounding mAb therapy for the treatment/prevention of infectious diseases.

References

    1. Brock T.D., editor. Milestones in Microbiology: 1556 to 1940. ASM Press; 1998.
    1. Saylor C. Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for microbial diseases. Vaccine. 2009;27S:G38–G46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marasco W.A., Sui J. The growth and potential of human antiviral monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:1421–1434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLean A.R., editor. SARS a Case Study in Emerging Infections. Oxford University Press; New York: 2005.
    1. Lowy I. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:197–205. - PubMed