Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;8(4):198-206.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.24.

The influence of perioperative factors on primary severe hypospadias repair

Affiliations
Review

The influence of perioperative factors on primary severe hypospadias repair

Marco Castagnetti et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital malformations of the male genitalia. Severe cases present with associated curvature greater than 30° and the meatus opening proximally to the penoscrotal junction. The perioperative management of patients with primary severe hypospadias is variable. Systematic evaluation of the upper urinary tract and the search for enlarged prostatic utricles seem unnecessary in patients with isolated primary severe hypospadias, and should be limited to severe cases with associated extraurinary malformations. Detection of a disorder of sex development is key for gender assignment and prognosis, but the identification of cases warranting a full work-up and the influence of such a diagnosis on the success of hypospadias repair is controversial. Preoperative hormonal stimulation allows for penile growth irrespective of the administration route. Associated morbidity is minimal, but its influence on the success of surgery is still unknown. An age of 6-18 months is generally recommended for surgery, but no trial data support this policy. Second-layer coverage of the urethroplasty and postoperative urinary drainage seem to reduce the complications of surgery, whereas postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and type of dressing have minimal impact on surgical success. Overall, most interventions are based on weak evidence, and their influence on the outcomes of repair is ill-defined. Clinicians should be made aware of the evidence supporting any single intervention in order to standardize their management policies. We hope the issues outlined here will prompt researchers to design new studies to address the clinically relevant questions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6):1151-5 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1986 Mar;135(3):537-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):77-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1993 May;71(5):593-5 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):1051-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources