Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;1(3):101-106.
doi: 10.1007/s12687-010-0023-z. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market

Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market

Pascal Borry et al. J Community Genet. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

In recent years, various private companies have been marketing and offering genetic tests directly to consumers. This article reviews the recent history of this commercial phenomenon. In particular, we discuss and describe the following subjects: (1) the factors that allowed for the creation of the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing (GT) market; (2) information regarding the size and potential success or failure of the DTC GT market; (3) recent changes in the DTC GT market; and (4) the recent events that may have an impact on the regulatory oversight of DTC genetic testing and the future evolution of this market. This review of factors suggests that despite the possibility of a change of business model as well as increased regulation, the commercialization of genetic testing is here to stay. As such it is important to pay close attention not only to the science underlying these tests but also to the ethical, legal, and social issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison M. Genetic testing clamp down. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:633. doi: 10.1038/nbt0710-633b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altman RB. Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: failure is not an option. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:15–17. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.63. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandelt HJ, Yao YG, Richards MB, Salas A. The brave new era of human genetic testing. Bioessays. 2008;30:1246–1251. doi: 10.1002/bies.20837. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg C, Fryer-Edwards K. The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Bus Ethics. 2008;77:17–31. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9298-8. - DOI
    1. Borry P. Europe to ban direct-to-consumer genetic tests? Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:736–737. doi: 10.1038/nbt0708-736. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources