Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;25(1):75-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0982-z.

Long-term peritoneal dialysis and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in children

Affiliations
Review

Long-term peritoneal dialysis and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in children

Masataka Honda et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is the most serious complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD), with a mortality rate that exceeds 30%. There have been many reports of the incidence of EPS being strongly correlated to the duration of PD. Patients on PD for longer than 5 years, and especially those receiving this treatment for more than 8 years, should undergo careful and repeated surveillance for risk factors associated with the development of EPS. The development of ultrafiltration failure, a high dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio, as determined by the peritoneal equilibration test, peritoneal calcification, a persistently elevated C-reactive protein level, and severe peritonitis in patients on PD for longer than 8 years are signals that should prompt the clinician to consider terminating PD as a possible means of preventing the development of EPS. The impact of the newer, biocompatible PD solutions on the incidence of EPS has not yet been determined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient survival rate in children initiating peritoneal dialysis before (broken line) and during/after 1992 (solid line). Cited from Honda [12]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Technique survival rate in children initiating peritoneal dialysis before (solid line) and during/after 1992 (broken line). Cited from Honda [12]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kawaguchi Y, Kawanishi H, Mujais S, Topley N, Oreopoulos DG. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: definition, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2000;20(Suppl 4):S43–S55. doi: 10.1177/089686080002004S04. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawaguchi Y, Saito A, Kawanishi H, Nakayama M, Miyazaki M, Nakamoto H, Tranaeus A. Recommendations on the management of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan, 2005: diagnosis, predictive markers, treatment, and preventive measures. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(Suppl 4):S83–S95. doi: 10.1177/089686080502504S12. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawanishi H, Moriishi M. Epidemiology of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(Suppl 4):S14–S18. doi: 10.1177/089686080502504S03. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nomoto Y, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo H, Hirano H, Sakai S, Kurokawa K. Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a report of the Japanese Sclerosing Encapsulating Peritonitis Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;28:420–427. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(96)90501-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rigby RJ, Hawley CM. Sclerosing peritonitis: the experience in Australia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:154–159. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.1.154. - DOI - PubMed