Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study
- PMID: 21476802
- DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10425
Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study
Abstract
Objective: The lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion is a minimal access technique that has been used by some to treat lumbar degenerative conditions, including degenerative scoliosis. Few studies, however, have analyzed its effect on coronal and sagittal plane correction, and no study has compared changes in segmental, regional, and global coronal and sagittal alignment after this technique. The object of this study was to determine changes in sagittal and coronal plane alignment occurring after direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF).
Methods: The authors performed a review of the radiographic records of 36 patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with the DLIF technique. Thirty-five patients underwent supplemental posterior fixation to maintain correction. Preoperative and postoperative standing anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs were obtained in all patients for measurement of segmental and regional coronal and sagittal Cobb angles. Standing anteroposterior and lateral 36-in radiographs were also obtained in 23 patients for measurement of global coronal (center sacral vertebral line) and sagittal (C-7 plumb line) balance.
Results: The mean coronal segmental Cobb angle was 4.5° preoperatively, and it was 1.5° postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar coronal Cobb angles were 7.6° and 3.6°, respectively (p = 0.0001). In 8 patients with degenerative scoliosis, the mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar coronal Cobb angles were 21.4° and 9.7°, respectively (p = 0.0004). The mean global coronal alignment was 19.1 mm preoperatively, and it was 12.5 mm postoperatively (p < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, the mean segmental Cobb angle measured -5.3° preoperatively and -8.2° postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar lordoses were 42.1° and 46.2°, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean global sagittal alignment was 41.5 mm preoperatively and 42.4 mm postoperatively (p = 0.7). The average clinical follow-up was 21 months in 21 patients. The mean pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were 7.7 and 2.9, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative Oswestry Disability Indices were 43 and 21, respectively (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Direct lateral interbody fusion significantly improves segmental, regional, and global coronal plane alignment in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Although DLIF increases the segmental sagittal Cobb angle at the level of instrumentation, it does not improve regional lumbar lordosis or global sagittal alignment.
Similar articles
-
Management of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity with minimally invasive anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary radiographic study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 May;20(5):515-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE1347. Epub 2014 Mar 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24628129
-
Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation.Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E7. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09263. Neurosurg Focus. 2010. PMID: 20192667
-
Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.Neurosurg Focus. 2014 May;36(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS13368. Neurosurg Focus. 2014. PMID: 24785476
-
Preservation or Restoration of Segmental and Regional Spinal Lordosis Using Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Conditions: A Literature Review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S50-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001470. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26825789 Review.
-
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity.J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Nov;22(11):1714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Jul 17. J Clin Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26190218
Cited by
-
Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.Int J Spine Surg. 2015 May 19;9:16. doi: 10.14444/2016. eCollection 2015. Int J Spine Surg. 2015. PMID: 26114085 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Conjunction with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation via the Wiltse Approach.Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1181-1190. doi: 10.1111/os.12960. Epub 2021 May 4. Orthop Surg. 2021. PMID: 33945217 Free PMC article.
-
Sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters after lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative scoliosis: a case-control study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 1;39(3):E166-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000073. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24150436 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.Int J Spine Surg. 2025 May 12;19(2):246-260. doi: 10.14444/8759. Int J Spine Surg. 2025. PMID: 40341118 Free PMC article.
-
MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:287-313. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3886-1. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25850387
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous