Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Mar 29;6(3):e18363.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018363.

Two-year longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial of physical activity promotion by general practitioners

Gonzalo Grandes  1 , Alvaro Sanchez, Imanol Montoya, Ricardo Ortega Sanchez-Pinilla, Jesús Torcal; PEPAF Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Two-year longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial of physical activity promotion by general practitioners

Gonzalo Grandes et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: We evaluate the effectiveness of a physical activity promotion programme carried out by general practitioners with inactive patients in routine care.

Methods and findings: Pragmatic, cluster randomised clinical trial conducted in eleven public primary care centres in Spain. Fifty-six general practitioners (GPs) were randomly assigned to intervention (29) or standard care (27) groups. They assessed the physical activity level of a systematic sample of patients in routine practice and recruited 4317 individuals (2248 intervention and 2069 control) who did not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Intervention GPs provided advice to all patients and a physical activity prescription to the subgroup attending an additional appointment (30%). A third of these prescriptions were opportunistically repeated. Control GPs provided standard care. Primary outcome measure was the change in self-reported physical activity from baseline to six, 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life. A total of 3691 patients (85%) were included in the longitudinal analysis and overall trends over the whole 24 month follow-up were significantly better in the intervention group (p<0.01). The greatest differences with the control group were observed at six months (adjusted difference 1.7 MET*hr/wk [95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6], 25 min/wk [95% CI, 11.3 to 38.4], and a 5.3% higher percentage of patients meeting minimum recommendations [95% CI: 2.1% to 8.8%] NNT = 19). These differences were not statistically significant at 12 and 24 months. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. A significant difference was maintained until 24 months in the proportion of patients achieving minimum recommendation in the subgroup that received a repeat prescription (adjusted difference 10.2%, 95% CI 1.5% to 19.4%).

Conclusions: General practitioners are effective at increasing the level of physical activity among their inactive patients during the initial six-months of an intervention but this effect wears off at 12 and 24 months. Only in the subgroup of patients receiving repeat prescriptions of physical activity is the effect maintained in long-term.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00131079.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of the PEPAF trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two years longitudinal change in physical activity by comparison groups and subgroups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Prevention. At least five a week: evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health: a report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: Department of Health; 2004.
    1. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. Available: http://health.gov/paguidelines. Accessed 2010 Aug 13.
    1. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1423–1434. - PubMed
    1. Martínez-González MA, Varo JJ, Santos JL, De Irala J, Gibney M, et al. Prevalence of physical activity during leisure time in the European Union. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(7):1142–1146. - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA. Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:421–443. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data