Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

Affiliations

Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

M Herdman et al. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure.

Methods: EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument's sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions.

Results: Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording 'slight-moderate-severe' problems, with anchors of 'no problems' and 'unable to do' in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states.

Conclusions: A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Brooks R. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care. 2005;43:736–749. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000172050.67085.4f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badia X, Schiaffino A, Alonso J, Herdman M. Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan general population: Feasibility and construct validity. Quality of Life Research. 1998;7:311–322. doi: 10.1023/A:1008894502042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devlin N, Hansen P, Herbison P. Variations in self-reported health status: Results from a New Zealand survey. The New Zealand Medical Journal. 2000;113:517–520. - PubMed
    1. Johnson JA, Pickard AS. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Medical Care. 2000;38:115–121. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200001000-00013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types