Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Apr 11:8:29.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-29.

Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Rosemary R C McEachan et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Increased physical activity levels benefit both an individuals' health and productivity at work. The purpose of the current study was to explore the impact and cost-effectiveness of a workplace physical activity intervention designed to increase physical activity levels.

Methods: A total of 1260 participants from 44 UK worksites (based within 5 organizations) were recruited to a cluster randomized controlled trial with worksites randomly allocated to an intervention or control condition. Measurement of physical activity and other variables occurred at baseline, and at 0 months, 3 months and 9 months post-intervention. Health outcomes were measured during a 30 minute health check conducted in worksites at baseline and 9 months post intervention. The intervention consisted of a 3 month tool-kit of activities targeting components of the Theory of Planned Behavior, delivered in-house by nominated facilitators. Self-reported physical activity (measured using the IPAQ short-form) and health outcomes were assessed.

Results and discussion: Multilevel modelling found no significant effect of the intervention on MET minutes of activity (from the IPAQ) at any of the follow-up time points controlling for baseline activity. However, the intervention did significantly reduce systolic blood pressure (B=-1.79 mm/Hg) and resting heart rate (B=-2.08 beats) and significantly increased body mass index (B=.18 units) compared to control. The intervention was found not to be cost-effective, however the substantial variability round this estimate suggested that further research is warranted.

Conclusions: The current study found mixed support for this worksite physical activity intervention. The paper discusses some of the tensions involved in conducting rigorous evaluations of large-scale randomized controlled trials in real-world settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram for participants and worksite (* all 44 worksites remained in the study, cum = cumulative).

References

    1. Allender S, Peto V, Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M. Coronary Heart Disease Statistics. London: British Heart Foundation; 2007.
    1. Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343:16–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007063430103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. 1996.
    1. Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendations for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2007;39:1423–1434. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care. Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet: England, February 2009. 2009.

Publication types

Associated data