Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 11:2011:1401.

Perineal care

Chris Kettle  1 , Susan Tohill
Affiliations

Perineal care

Chris Kettle et al. BMJ Clin Evid. .

Abstract

Introduction: Over 85% of women having a vaginal birth suffer some perineal trauma. Spontaneous tears requiring suturing are estimated to occur in at least a third of women in the UK and US, with anal sphincter tears in 0.5% to 7% of women. Perineal trauma can lead to long-term physical and psychological problems.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of intrapartum surgical and non-surgical interventions on rates of perineal trauma? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of first- and second-degree tears and episiotomies? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (third- and fourth-degree tears)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results: We found 38 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: active pushing, spontaneous pushing, and sustained breath-holding (Valsalva) method of pushing; continuous support during labour; conventional suturing; different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries; episiotomies (midline and mediolateral incisions); epidural analgesia; forceps; methods of delivery ("hands-on" method, "hands poised"); water births; non-suturing of muscle and skin (or perineal skin alone); passive descent in the second stage of labour; positions (supine or lithotomy positions, upright position during delivery); restrictive or routine use of episiotomy; sutures (absorbable synthetic sutures, catgut sutures, continuous sutures, interrupted sutures); and vacuum extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fernando RJ, Williams AA, Adams EJ; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . The management of third and fourth degree perineal tears. RCOG Green top Guidelines No 29. 2007. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg29/ (last accessed 16 September 2014).
    1. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:1262–1272. - PubMed
    1. Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, et al. West Berkshire perineal management trial. BMJ 1984;289:587–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics–NHS maternity statistics, England: 2012–2013. December 2013. Available at http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB12744 (last accessed 16 September 2014).
    1. DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ, Podgornik MN. 2003 National hospital discharge survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics 359. 2005.

Publication types